VentaProst Versus Conventionally-Administered Aerosolized Epoprostenol in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With CPB
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Hypertension
- Registration Number
- NCT03122730
- Lead Sponsor
- Aerogen Pharma Limited
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the Phase 2a study is to: 1) demonstrate that the estimated VentaProst dose is safe and equivalent in effect to a dose administered via epoprostenol aerosolization by the current off-label-use practice; and 2) demonstrate that an optimum effect can be rapidly obtained with VentaProst titration.
- Detailed Description
Part I:
This part of the study is designed to demonstrate the dose equivalence between off-label aerosolized epoprostenol and VentaProst using a patient's hemodynamic parameters.
Part II:
This part of the study is designed to establish a dose response relationship of VentaProst to hemodynamic effect by dose escalation in patients who have had cardiac surgery with CPB.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 17
-
Women and Men 18 to 75 years of age
-
Provide written informed consent
-
Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol
-
For patients in Part I:
- Undergo cardiac surgery on CPB
- Clinically require treatment with and receive aerosolized epoprostenol
- Demonstrate a clinically meaningful hemodynamic response to aerosolized epoprostenol
-
For patients in Part II:
- Undergo cardiac surgery with CPB
- Have perioperative pulmonary hypertension
- Clinically require treatment with inhaled epoprostenol
- Current smoker (i.e., within the last 30 days)
- Emergency operative status
- Upper and/or lower respiratory tract infection within four weeks of screening
- Contraindication to transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) including esophageal disease or unstable cervical spine
- Renal or severe hepatic impairment
- Thromboembolic disease treated with anticoagulant therapy
- Bleeding disorders
- Significant restrictive or obstructive lung disease
- History of concurrent malignancy or recurrence of malignancy within two years prior to Screening
- History of a diagnosis of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last three years
- Recent history of stroke or transient ischemic attack
- Significantly abnormal laboratory tests at Screening
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Treatment with an investigational drug, biologic, or device within 30 days
- Other severe, acute, or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of trial results and, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this trial
- Any condition where aerosolized epoprostenol is contraindicated
- Known allergy or sensitivity to epoprostenol, any of its ingredients, or the diluent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Identify Equivalent Dose of VentaProst Necessary to Achieve a PD Response Comparable to Standard of Care Treatment (Part I) Pharmacodynamic changes will be measured during surgery (Day 1), post-surgery (Day 1), and from start of study treatment (Day 1) through study completion (up to 30 days) The primary goal was to establish the dose of VentaProst necessary to achieve a PD response comparable to the standard of care. The first dose of VentaProst tested, 17 ng/kg/min, achieved the dose equivalency.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Optimal Dose Determination With VP Dose Escalation (Part II) Pharmacodynamic changes will be measured during surgery (Day 1), post-surgery (Day 1), and from start of study treatment (Day 1) through study completion (up to 30 days) Calculate vascular resistance indicators for CI and CO, and PAPi at each dose level. Identify the VP dose where mPAP, VR(CO), VR(CI), CVP are lowest, and CI/CO are highest. Compare in a narrative to the selected VP optimal dose by the Investigator by individual patient.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Stanford University Medical Center
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
Rush University Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Tufts Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Stanford University Medical Center🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States