MedPath

VentaProst Versus Conventionally-Administered Aerosolized Epoprostenol in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With CPB

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Pulmonary Hypertension
Registration Number
NCT03122730
Lead Sponsor
Aerogen Pharma Limited
Brief Summary

The purpose of the Phase 2a study is to: 1) demonstrate that the estimated VentaProst dose is safe and equivalent in effect to a dose administered via epoprostenol aerosolization by the current off-label-use practice; and 2) demonstrate that an optimum effect can be rapidly obtained with VentaProst titration.

Detailed Description

Part I:

This part of the study is designed to demonstrate the dose equivalence between off-label aerosolized epoprostenol and VentaProst using a patient's hemodynamic parameters.

Part II:

This part of the study is designed to establish a dose response relationship of VentaProst to hemodynamic effect by dose escalation in patients who have had cardiac surgery with CPB.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
17
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Women and Men 18 to 75 years of age

  2. Provide written informed consent

  3. Willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

  4. For patients in Part I:

    1. Undergo cardiac surgery on CPB
    2. Clinically require treatment with and receive aerosolized epoprostenol
    3. Demonstrate a clinically meaningful hemodynamic response to aerosolized epoprostenol
  5. For patients in Part II:

    1. Undergo cardiac surgery with CPB
    2. Have perioperative pulmonary hypertension
    3. Clinically require treatment with inhaled epoprostenol
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Current smoker (i.e., within the last 30 days)
  2. Emergency operative status
  3. Upper and/or lower respiratory tract infection within four weeks of screening
  4. Contraindication to transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) including esophageal disease or unstable cervical spine
  5. Renal or severe hepatic impairment
  6. Thromboembolic disease treated with anticoagulant therapy
  7. Bleeding disorders
  8. Significant restrictive or obstructive lung disease
  9. History of concurrent malignancy or recurrence of malignancy within two years prior to Screening
  10. History of a diagnosis of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the last three years
  11. Recent history of stroke or transient ischemic attack
  12. Significantly abnormal laboratory tests at Screening
  13. Pregnant or breastfeeding
  14. Treatment with an investigational drug, biologic, or device within 30 days
  15. Other severe, acute, or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that may increase the risk associated with trial participation or investigational product administration or may interfere with the interpretation of trial results and, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this trial
  16. Any condition where aerosolized epoprostenol is contraindicated
  17. Known allergy or sensitivity to epoprostenol, any of its ingredients, or the diluent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Identify Equivalent Dose of VentaProst Necessary to Achieve a PD Response Comparable to Standard of Care Treatment (Part I)Pharmacodynamic changes will be measured during surgery (Day 1), post-surgery (Day 1), and from start of study treatment (Day 1) through study completion (up to 30 days)

The primary goal was to establish the dose of VentaProst necessary to achieve a PD response comparable to the standard of care. The first dose of VentaProst tested, 17 ng/kg/min, achieved the dose equivalency.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Optimal Dose Determination With VP Dose Escalation (Part II)Pharmacodynamic changes will be measured during surgery (Day 1), post-surgery (Day 1), and from start of study treatment (Day 1) through study completion (up to 30 days)

Calculate vascular resistance indicators for CI and CO, and PAPi at each dose level. Identify the VP dose where mPAP, VR(CO), VR(CI), CVP are lowest, and CI/CO are highest. Compare in a narrative to the selected VP optimal dose by the Investigator by individual patient.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Stanford University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Stanford, California, United States

Rush University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Tufts Medical Center

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Stanford University Medical Center
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.