跳至主要内容
临床试验/ISRCTN54937993
ISRCTN54937993已完成未知

The use of the laryngeal tube versus the endotracheal tube in out-of hospital cardiac arrest and their effects on arterial blood gas analysis: a randomized, controlled trial

Medical University of Vienna (Austria)0 个研究点目标入组 1,400 人开始时间: 2014年9月9日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
1,400

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

性别
All

入选标准

  • 1. Adult patients with an age of >18 years
  • 2. Patients with witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin (determined by the emergency physician)
  • 3. Cardiac arrest patients with ongoing chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation

排除标准

  • 1. Standardized Lund University Cardiac Arrest System (LUCAS, Physiocontrol, 22370 Lund Sweden) mechanical chest compressions not applied before randomization
  • 2. Traumatic OHCA:
  • 2.1. Cardiac arrest due to exsanguination, strangulation, hanging or drowning
  • 2.2. Cardiac arrest due to presumed intracranial hemorrhage
  • 2.3. Cardiac arrest due to respiratory failure
  • 2.4. Patients with an Allow-natural-death- (AND) or Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) order or patients with a terminal illness
  • 2.5 Known or clinically apparent pregnancy
  • 2.6. Airway device has been introduced before the emergency physician has arrived at the scene
  • 2.7 Already established tracheostomy e.g. coniotomy
  • 2.8. Upper airway obstruction due to a foreign body or massive pharyngeal swelling e.g. edema for example due to an allergic reaction
  • 2.9. Ward of the state / prisoner

研究者

发起方
Medical University of Vienna (Austria)

相似试验