MedPath

Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Gingival Recession
Root Planing
Interventions
Procedure: xenogeneic collagen matrix
Registration Number
NCT04966208
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach.

This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • -The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25%
Exclusion Criteria
  • -Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
root coverage surgeries using autologous connective tissue for treatment of gingival recessionxenogeneic collagen matrixroot coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of autologous connective tissue as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession
root coverage surgeries using xenogenic collagen matrix for treatment of gingival recessionxenogeneic collagen matrixroot coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of mucodrm membrane ; xenogeneic collagen matrix as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The zone of keratinized gingiva6 months after the surgery

The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Periodontal probing depth6 months after the surgery

measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the gingival sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.

Patient satisfaction of the esthetics6 months

measured using the visual analog scale.

Clinical attachment loss6 months after the surgery

measured from the cementoenamel junction to the depth of the sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.

Gingival recession6 months after the surgery

The depth measured from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction in mm.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assiut University

🇪🇬

Assuit, Egypt

Assiut University
🇪🇬Assuit, Egypt
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath