Root Coverage Using Tunneling Technique of Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Autologous Connective Tissue as a Treatment of Miller Class Two Gingival Recession (RCT Study)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- The zone of keratinized gingiva
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach.
This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).
Investigators
Ahmed Mortada
Lecturer of Periodontology and Oral Implantology-Faculty of Dentistry, Assiut University, Egypt.
Assiut University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •-The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25%
Exclusion Criteria
- •-Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The zone of keratinized gingiva
Time Frame: 6 months after the surgery
The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.
Secondary Outcomes
- Periodontal probing depth(6 months after the surgery)
- Patient satisfaction of the esthetics(6 months)
- Clinical attachment loss(6 months after the surgery)
- Gingival recession(6 months after the surgery)