Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Gingival Recession; Root Planing

• Registration Number: NCT04966208
• Lead Sponsor: Assiut University

Brief Summary

Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach.

This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2020-09-01
• Primary Completion: 2021-03-01
• Study Completion: 2021-06-15
• Study First Submitted: 2021-06-21
• Status Verified: 2021-07
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-07-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-07-07
• Study First Posted: 2021-07-19
• Last Update Posted: 2021-07-19

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 24

Inclusion Criteria

• -The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25%

Exclusion Criteria

• -Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The zone of keratinized gingiva	6 months after the surgery	The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Periodontal probing depth	6 months after the surgery	measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the gingival sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Patient satisfaction of the esthetics	6 months	measured using the visual analog scale.
Clinical attachment loss	6 months after the surgery	measured from the cementoenamel junction to the depth of the sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Gingival recession	6 months after the surgery	The depth measured from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction in mm.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assiut University; 🇪🇬 Assuit, Egypt