Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06453369
NCT06453369
Completed
Not Applicable

A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession - Randomized Clinical Trial

October 6 University1 site in 1 country32 target enrollmentMarch 2, 2022

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Gingival Recession
Sponsor
October 6 University
Enrollment
32
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
percentage of root coverage
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Recent plastic procedures have provided satisfactory results in the treatment of gingival recession but there is, presently, a greater need for procedure that cause less surgical morbidity as also provide improved results. In this study we propose a novel vertical tunnel technique as a minimally invasive approach (Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach) and evaluate clinical results in comparison to CAMT, both using CTG. The novel technique allows stability of the graft, maximum coronal vascularity and minimum soft tissue reflection.

Detailed Description

The tunnel technique is an approach that optimizes esthetics and predictability because of its ability to avoid releasing critical papillae and maintaining a high level of vascularity at the surgical site to support the grafts. The tunnel technique has a minimally invasive nature since the interdental papillae are left intact and vertical incisions are not performed which results in better esthetics. This technique entailed the placement of a connective tissue graft in the tunnel. Complete graft coverage is not mandatory as long as the graft dimensions are sufficient to ensure its survival. Avoiding detachment of the highly fragile interdental soft tissue can minimize the risk of losing papilla height in critical esthetic areas, avoid scar formation, maximize the papillary and lateral blood supply to the underlying graft and better stabilize the graft for optimal wound healing Recent plastic procedures have provided satisfactory results in the treatment of gingival recession but there is, presently, a greater need for procedure that cause less surgical morbidity as also provide improved results. In this study we propose a novel vertical tunnel technique as a minimally invasive approach (Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach) and evaluate clinical results in comparison to CAMT, both using CTG. The novel technique allows stability of the graft, maximum coronal vascularity and minimum soft tissue reflection.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2, 2022
End Date
February 4, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Aslam Ashraf Mogahed

principle investigator. Aslam Ashraf Mogahed

October 6 University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age above 18 years old.
  • The presence of Miller's class I gingival recession (25).
  • Recession defect on maxillary incisors, maxillary and mandibular canines, or premolars.
  • Absence of a history of periodontal surgery at the involved sites in the last 12 months.
  • History of compliance with oral hygiene instructions and periodontal recall.
  • Sufficient palatal donor tissue thickness (\> 2mm).
  • Clearly identifiable cemento-enamel-junction (CEJ)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with systemic illness known to affect the outcome of periodontal therapy, including diabetes, immune deficiencies, etc (26).
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • Current use of any form of tobacco.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

percentage of root coverage

Time Frame: 1 month, 3 and 6 months

Percentage root coverage (%RC): calculated as (\[RD preoperative - RD postoperative\]/RD preoperative) × 100%.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Plaque index (PI)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Probing depth (PD)(6 months)
  • Complete root coverage (CRC)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Recession Depth (RD)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Recession width (RW)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Clinical attachment level (CAL)(6 months)
  • Gingival Thickness (GT)(6 months)
  • Width of the keratinized tissue (KTW)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Gingival index (GI)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Pain index (PN)(1 month, 3 and 6 months)
  • Professional esthetic evaluation and patient-reported satisfaction(6 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials