MedPath

Can Remote Photoplethysmography Be Used for Contactless Vital Sign Acquisition in a Healthcare Setting? A Prospective Comparative Study.

Not Applicable
Conditions
Coronavirus
Respiratory Disease
Cardiac Disease
Vascular Diseases
Interventions
Device: Remote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) vital sign acquisition
Registration Number
NCT04489407
Lead Sponsor
Lady Davis Institute
Brief Summary

Contactless and widely available health monitoring technologies are of growing interest in the context of the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is a well-studied technology that interprets variations in skin colour related to blood flow which, when analysed with complex mathematical algorithm, generates vital sign readings. This technology has been refined and embedded in a smartphone app designed to acquire heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation using a front-facing smartphone camera.

Preliminary data comparing the accuracy of smartphone rPPG readings with conventional vital sign monitor readings are promising; however, less than 5% of the population studied in the app development phase had oxygen saturation levels below 95% making it impossible to ensure reliability in these populations.

The goal of this study is to compare readings acquired using this rPPG app with the readings from hospital grade, Health Canada approved vital signs monitors used in healthcare settings with a focus on subject with low oxygen saturations. We will also study other sociodemographic and clinical features that may influence the accuracy of the readings. This will be achieved by recruiting consenting adults presenting to care in acute care settings and a designated COVID outpatient clinic. Vital signs will be acquired using the rPPG app and conventional hospital vital sign monitors simultaneously. Readings will be repeated within 2-5 minutes when time permits. Statistical analysis will be performed to analyze the findings and determine the accuracy and precision of the rPPG app readings.

It is expected that the vital sign readings acquired with the rPPG app will be almost identical to those acquired using hospital-grade monitors for all subjects regardless of age, gender, skin colour, COVID status and relevant comorbidities.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
350
Inclusion Criteria
  • Persons willing to participate and capable of providing informed consent, age of 18 years of more.
  • Person able to sit still for the duration of the reading (maximum 2 minutes per reading).
  • Persons with freckles, discreet skin pigmentation changes
Exclusion Criteria
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Persons who are unable to follow basic instructions due to altered mental status, delirium, dementia or other conditions.
  • Age < 18
  • Intubated patients and patients requiring masks for supplemental oxygen
  • Persons refusing to remove masks, eyewear, or clothing obstructing the face for the duration of readings.
  • Persons with facial tattoos, large birthmarks or other skin alterations (scars, hemangiomas) on their nose or upper cheeks (cheekbones).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Conventional Vital Sign Monitor ReadingsRemote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) vital sign acquisitionOxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate obtained with conventional vital sign monitors and manual respiratory rate counts.
rPPG Vital Sign Monitor ReadingsRemote Photoplethysmography (rPPG) vital sign acquisitionOxygen saturation, heart rate and respiratory rate obtained with the rPPG app.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Accuracy of rPPG heart rateimmediate; paired reading

Accuracy of rPPG heart rate compared to conventional vital sign monitor heart rate readings. Comparison of each paired reading.

Accuracy of rPPG oxygen saturationimmediate; paired reading

Accuracy of rPPG oxygen saturation compared to conventional vital sign monitor oxygen saturation readings. Comparison of discrepancy within each paired reading set.

Accuracy of rPPG respiratory rateimmediate; paired reading

Accuracy of rPPG respiratory rate compared to manual counting of respiratory rate over 60 seconds. Comparison of discrepancy within each paired reading set.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reproducibility of rPPG heart rate readings2-5 minutes

Comparison of rPPG heart rate results obtained on a given patient on serial readings within 2 minutes of each other.

Reproducibility of rPPG respiratory rate readings2-5 minutes

Comparison of rPPG respiratory rate results obtained on a given patient on serial readings within 2 minutes of each other.

Reproducibility of rPPG oxygen saturation readings2-5 minutes

Comparison of rPPG oxygen saturation results obtained on a given patient on serial readings within 2 minutes of each other.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath