Comparison of directable and angulated stylet for securing airway
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/06/069016
- Lead Sponsor
- Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patient undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation
2. American Society of Anaesthesiologist grade I and II
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patient not willing to participate in study.
2. Patients with in situ endotracheal tube.
3. Anticipated difficult airway.
4. Known cervical spine injury.
5. Patient who requires rapid sequence induction.
6. Patient who requires an emergency operation.
7. Pregnant patients.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of directable stylet with stylet angulated 75 degree in routine orotracheal intubation using C-MAC videolaryngoscope with respect to rate of successful intubation in first attempt.Timepoint: 8weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Time taken for intubation. <br/ ><br>2. Number of attempts for intubation. <br/ ><br>3. Difficulty of intubation. <br/ ><br>4. Easy Removal of stylet. <br/ ><br>5. Complications - Trauma, Bleeding from oropharyngeal structure.Timepoint: 8weeks <br/ ><br>