NCT04068935
Completed
Not Applicable
Buddy Taping Compared to Splint Immobilizations for Reduced Paediatric Finger Fractures
University Children's Hospital, Zurich1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentAugust 20, 2019
ConditionsFracture Finger
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Fracture Finger
- Sponsor
- University Children's Hospital, Zurich
- Enrollment
- 50
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- secondary fracture displacement
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Fracture immobilization with Buddy taping is not inferior to Splint immobilization for non-displaced extra-articular paediatric finger fractures. However, whether the same applies for reduced finger fractures is unclear.
Detailed Description
Displaced fractures will be reduced in the paediatric ED by Emergency physicians. After fracture reduction, fracture immobilization will either be done with a Splint immobilization or a fingertaping. After 4 and 21 days, clinical and radiographic controls will take place at the Hand surgery outpatient clinic.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •extraarticular displaced finger fractures of the proximal or middle phalanges
Exclusion Criteria
- •fractures of the thumb
- •fractures that are open, instable, pathologic or multifragmented
- •multiple fractures of the Hand
- •phalangeal neck fractures
- •presentation later than 5 days after the injury
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
secondary fracture displacement
Time Frame: 5 and 21 days after fracture reduction
X-ray controls
Secondary Outcomes
- Patient comfort(5 and 21 days after fracture reduction)
- Need for analgesic medication(5 and 21 days after fracture reduction)
- total range of Motion(6 month after fracture reduction)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of splints on hand functioStroke.Stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarctionIRCT201009294836N1Army University of Medical Sciences31
Withdrawn
Not Applicable
Investigation of Clinical Outcome of ACL Reconstruction Utilizing Two Tibial Fixation Techniques, Concentric Tapered Interference Screws and Interference Screw and SheathPrimary ACL TearsNCT00364897Hadassah Medical Organization140
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of transpedicular fixation with fusion with transpedicular fixation alone in spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Control TrialSpondylolisthesis.SpondylolisthesisM43.1IRCT20230907059376N3Afridi Medical Complex, Peshawar28
Recruiting
Not Applicable
pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation versus without in the treatment of spinal stenosis following posterior spinal fusion surgery, superiority according to bone mineral density: A three-arm randomized open clinical trial.Condition 1: Patients with spinal canal stenosis are candidates for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Condition 2: Osteoporosis is defined as a mean adjusted T-score of -1.5 or below.Spinal stenosisOsteoporosis without current pathological fractureM48.0IRCT20190126042496N2eurofunctional Research Center of Shohada Tajrish Hospital92
Completed
Phase 2
The effect of patellar taping and patellar bracing on pain and fuction in females with knee paiPatellofemoral pain syndrome.Patellofemoral disordersIRCT2015081123593N1Vice chancellor for research, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences30