MedPath

Several Studys Showed That Upper Limb Amputated Patients Are Able to Experience the Illusion of the Rubber Hand Whith Prosthesis: We Want to go Futher by Comparing the Strength of the Incorporation According to the Type of Prosthesis Using the Illusion of the Rubber Hand With Prothesis

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Appropriate Affect
Interventions
Other: Modified illusion of the rubber (syncrhone)
Other: Modified illusion of the rubber (asynchrone)
Registration Number
NCT05931198
Lead Sponsor
Institut Robert Merle d'aubigné
Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the strength of the incorporation according to the type of prosthesis (aesthetic, mechanical, myoelectric) with the experience the illusion of the rubber hand. The investigators will replace is the rubber by the patient's prothesis. The population will be people with upper arm amputation above the hand and they will be their own comparation.

Participants will do the the experience the illusion of the rubber hand in asynchronic and synchronic way and to answer questionnaries.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • At least one upper limb amputation
  • Informed and consented to participate to the study
Exclusion Criteria
  • having a history of severe neurological, visual or musculoskeletal impairments (other than the loss of a limb)
  • with severe serious psychiatric disorders (e.g. schizophrenia)
  • having problems understanding French in order to guarantee a good understanding of the questionnaires
  • under guardianship or curatorship

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Upper limb amputee populationModified illusion of the rubber (syncrhone)-
Upper limb amputee populationModified illusion of the rubber (asynchrone)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proprioceptive driftImmediately after the intervention

Before and after each intervention, we are going to ask to the patient to point where we touch the residual limb on a graduated board.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Influence of patient's characteristicDuring the patient's inclusion / Baseline

Compare patient's characteristic with other outome : amputation level, time since amputation, time using the prothestics

Appropriate affectImmediately after the intervention

After each intervention, patient will answering to a questionnary about appropriation with their past as comparaison.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Institut Robert Merle d'Aubigné

🇫🇷

Valenton, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath