Assessment of the Prosthetic System Impact on Mental Workload in Above-knee Lower Limb Amputees.
- Conditions
- Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)
- Registration Number
- NCT06635655
- Lead Sponsor
- Proteor Group
- Brief Summary
New generation of lower limb prosthesis provide improved functionalities. They are usually studied in the scope of biomechanics, sometimes PROMs like quality of life. Following users feedback, it is desirable to better understand why and how mental workload is impacted by new technologies or features. This clinical investigation will try to measure a difference between different prosthetic systems, in lab and in daily life.
- Detailed Description
Multicentric, national, observational, prospective study, using AB type SCED.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
- above-knee lower limb amputation
- using an above-knee prosthesis with prosthetic knee and foot
- eligible to use Synsys
- able to design therapeutic objectives for the GAS
- having a smartphone
- protected person
- pregnant or breast-feeding lady
- knee-to-ground height lower than 43cm
- weighting more than 125kg
- using their prosthesis for less than 2 weeks
- not covered by health insurance
- aged less than 18 or more than 84 years old
- bilateral amputee or hip disarticulated
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks Scale from -3 to +2. The higher the better.
-3 being a deterioration, -2 being the baseline, 0 the objective, +2 the maximum
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method L-test and Dual-task L-test Initial visit, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks To assess locomotor capacity in divided attention on a short period
Two-minute walk test (2MWT) and 2MWT in divided attention Initial visit, at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks to assess locomoto capacity and mental worload during a 2-minute exercise
Activity Balance Confidence Scale (ABC-scale) at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks Patient reported balance confidence Scale from 0% (minimum) to 100% (maximum), the higher the better.
Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ-A) at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks Patient reported satisfaction Visual Analog Scale from 0% (minimum) to 100% (maximum) The higher the better
Stumbles and falls at 4 weeks, and at 8 weeks Self-reported number The lower the better
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Multiple sites
🇫🇷Multiple Locations, France