Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Difficult Airway: Randomized Comparative Study

Alexandria University1 site in 1 country160 target enrollmentJanuary 10, 2022

ConditionsDifficult Mask Ventilation Difficult Intubation

Overview

Phase: Not Applicable
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Difficult Mask Ventilation
Sponsor: Alexandria University
Enrollment: 160
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: duration of intubation procedure
Last Updated: 3 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Videolaryngoscopy provides a better laryngeal view and do not need airway alignment for tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

The C-MAC-VS can be connected easily to the same C- MAC monitor and Pocket Monitor without requiring any additional light source and camera. This device is great for cases with limited mouth opening, airway obstruction and difficult intubation. C-MAC-VS has no lumens so it's very easy to clean and it can accommodates a size ETT 6.0 and greater.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

January 10, 2022

End Date

July 2022

Last Updated

3 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Alexandria University

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

rehab zayed

Assisstant Professor of Anesthesia

Alexandria University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2,
•presence of any predictors of difficult intubation;
•Mallampati score \> =3;
•inter-incisor distance \< 3 cm;
•thyromental distance \< 6 cm;
•neck extension \< 80°from neck flexion;
•cervical spine instability; history of difficult endotracheal intubation or difficult mask ventilation