NCT04759300UnknownNot Applicable
Effectiveness of C-MAC Video-stylet Versus C-MAC D- Blade Video-laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Predicted Difficult Airway: Randomized Comparative Study
Alexandria University2 sites in 1 country160 target enrollmentStarted: January 10, 2022Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Alexandria University
- Enrollment
- 160
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- duration of intubation procedure
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Videolaryngoscopy provides a better laryngeal view and do not need airway alignment for tracheal intubation.
Detailed Description
The C-MAC-VS can be connected easily to the same C- MAC monitor and Pocket Monitor without requiring any additional light source and camera. This device is great for cases with limited mouth opening, airway obstruction and difficult intubation. C-MAC-VS has no lumens so it's very easy to clean and it can accommodates a size ETT 6.0 and greater.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Diagnostic
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2,
- •presence of any predictors of difficult intubation;
- •Mallampati score > =3;
- •inter-incisor distance < 3 cm;
- •thyromental distance < 6 cm;
- •neck extension < 80°from neck flexion;
- •cervical spine instability; history of difficult endotracheal intubation or difficult mask ventilation
Exclusion Criteria
- •patients have increased risk of pulmonary aspiration;
- •have significant medical diseases in term of cardiac, respiratory, hepatic, renal
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
duration of intubation procedure
Time Frame: 10 minutes
assess duration of intubation procedure by using C-MAC VS versus C-MAC D-blade in patients with anticipated difficult airway.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
rehab zayed
Assisstant Professor of Anesthesia
Alexandria University
Study Sites (2)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal IntubationIntubationVideolaryngoscopyChildrenNCT03908775Inonu University102
Unknown
Not Applicable
C-MAC Video Laryngoscope and VS-CMAC Fiberoptic Stylet for Awake Endoscopic Intubation in Predicted Difficult AirwaysDifficult Airway IntubationNCT04532138Università Politecnica delle Marche17
Completed
Not Applicable
Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Pediatric AnesthesiaTracheal Intubation MorbidityNCT03747250Brno University Hospital501
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
A clinical trial to study the difference between fibre optic bronchoscope intubation and C Mac video laryngoscopic intubation in cervical spine injury patient under awake conditioCTRI/2024/04/065456Dr. Thalishetti Yugala
Completed
Not Applicable
Effects of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope, McGRATH Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope on Intraocular Pressure and HemodynamicsAnesthesiology Devices Associated With Adverse IncidentsIntraocular PressureNCT03589638Inonu University3