MedPath

COvid Pandemic Institutional maNaGement

Conditions
Covid19
Interventions
Other: Quantitative analysis for Patients
Other: Qualitative analysis for professionals
Other: Quantitative analysis for Professionals
Other: Tools development
Registration Number
NCT04908007
Lead Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Brief Summary

Covid-19 has increased organizational tensions within health services (lack of resources, difficulties in recruiting healthcare professionals , elderly and polypathological patients, etc.) and tested the reliability of health facilities. This project aims to draw lessons so that hospitals can transform themselves while improving their reliability to face future crises and other exceptional situations.

Research hypothesis:

Crisis management arrangements lack sensitivity to uncertainty, which manifests itself in lower quality of care and efficiency losses for the entire institution.

The virtuous practices implemented during the crisis spontaneously incorporated principles of the highly reliable organization.

The integration of principles from complexity theory into the management of institutions promotes high reliability organization.

Sustaining these virtuous practices in order to anticipate and cope with crises requires the activation of two interconnected levers: a shared vision (by patients, healthcare professionals, ARS, HAS, and the Ministry in the first place) of the meaning of the action taken by hospitals, and the development of a policy enabling hospitals to become both learning and highly reliable.

Main objective:

To evaluate the management process of the Covid-19 epidemic by the university hospitals of the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, and the structures linked to them (establishments in their territory, ARS, user associations), in terms of points of improvement and good practices. This evaluation concerns the preparation, management and exit phases of the crisis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20000
Inclusion Criteria
  • Establishments :

    • 4 university hospitals: Lyon, St Etienne, Clermont Ferrand, Grenoble
    • Establishments in the same territories, public and private
  • Professionals and members of the institutions' bodies:

    • Governance: management and chair of the CME
    • Management (care, communication, medical, technical, logistics, IT, personnel)
    • Clinical and public health cluster governance
    • Medical, paramedical and non-medical staff in the departments most concerned (emergency and EMS reception, intensive care, infectiology, hygiene, virology, imaging, occupational medicine in particular)
    • Organizations representing the personnel
    • Members of the users' representatives committee
  • Adult patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours during the study period (quantitative study by questionnaires).

Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • none
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patient quantitative groupQuantitative analysis for PatientsQuantitative analysis of crisis management using a questionnaire sent to patients hospitalized in the first wave asking them about their perception of crisis and post-crisis management.
Professional qualitative groupQualitative analysis for professionalsQualitative analysis of crisis management by interviewing professionals most involved during the crisis in each university hospital.
Professional quantitative groupQuantitative analysis for ProfessionalsQuantitative analysis of crisis management using the WHO grid adapted sent to the target persons identified within the establishments
Tools developmentTools developmentDevelopment of tools to prepare for situations of uncertainty
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Crisis management process based on a qualitative approachThe Qualitative analysis (intervention 1) will take place from September, 2020 to December, 2021

The qualitative evaluation (interviews, document review) will make it possible to identify the points of improvement and virtuous practices implemented in the establishments.

Crisis management process based on a quantitative approach with the patients (hospitalized in the first wave)The Quantitative analysis for patients (intervention 3) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021. The tool development phase (intervention 4) will be carried out from January, 2022 to June, 2022

The second quantitative evaluation will be based on patients' perceptions with a constructed questionnaire on theses perimeters: crisis and post-crisis management, from the point of view of points of improvement and good practices.

This patient experience questionnaire will be adapted to COVID with expert/partner patients and user associations.

Crisis management process based on a quantitative approach with the professionals (identified within the establishments)The Quantitative analysis for professionals (intervention 2) will be conducted from March, 2021 to June 2021.

The quantitative evaluation will be based on the WHO checklist. This first part will report, for each hospital, the proportion of items validated in each dimension of the WHO checklist (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/hospital-emergency-response-checklist):

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

CHU Clermont-Ferrand , Pôle de Santé Publique, unité d'Epidémiologie, Economie de la Santé et Prévention

🇫🇷

Clermont-Ferrand, France

CHU Grenoble, Pôle Santé Publique, service de veille sanitaire

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

CHU Saint-Etienne , Unité de gestion du risque infectieux

🇫🇷

Saint-Étienne, France

Hospices Civils de Lyon, DOQ-RU

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath