Standardized Comprehensive Two-month Ambulatory Neurorehabilitation Program for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: a Randomized-controlled Trial

Brief Summary

Detailed Description

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and the most common cause of non-traumatic disability in young adults in western countries. The incidence of MS is low in childhood and increases after the age of 18, reaching a peak between 20 and 40 years (mean age of 30 years) with women being affected approximately 2-5 years earlier than men. In Switzerland the incidence is thought to be 4:100.000 with approximately 12.500 affected patients. Despite increasing therapeutic options to ameliorate the disease course, most patients suffer from persistent neurological deficits over time. Neurologic symptoms can be manifold and are highly variable amongst patients. They include loss of vision, sensorimotor defects, impaired manual dexterity, ataxia, apraxia, gait disturbances, bladder- and bowl problems, fatigue, cognitive dysfunctions and others, which alone, or in combination, lead to disability in MS patients. Disability in MS has a negative impact on patients life's impairing activities of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QoL) and leading to loss of work and the need providing care. This results in tremendous socioeconomic burden. Disease-modifying treatments prevent disability progression in variable extent. However no drugs are available ameliorate persistent disability in MS. Therefore, exercise training as well as physical and occupational therapies are important in the symptomatic treatment of MS. Intensive task oriented circuit training has been shown to be effective in stroke improving gait, and several ADL. Some pilot randomized controlled trials in MS demonstrated exercise training being able to improve muscular strength, aerobic capacity and ambulatory performance as well as fatigue, balance and gait. Furthermore, specific therapies improve manual dexterity, coordination and mobilization in MS patients as well. Although, so far no randomized trial has been done to prove the effectiveness of task oriented circuit training in MS. Physical and occupational therapy is usually performed close to patients home by therapist with different professional background in a non-standardized way. The investigators therefore aim to develop a standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program, integrating task oriented circuit training for MS patients to improve disability, ADL and QoL that can be easily adopted in other ambulatory or hospital settings. Objective To evaluate the impact of a standardized comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program on disability in patients with multiple sclerosis measured by performance based test of the upper and lower extremities and by patient recorded outcome measures regarding functioning of the upper and lower extremities, activities of daily living and quality of life. The investigators hypothesize that this training program will improve disability, activities of daily living and quality of live in MS patients. Methods Prospective double center, randomized, cross-over study. Consecutive MS patients that complain about disability that affects ADL and/or QoL will be recruited to participate in a comprehensive ambulatory neurorehabilitation program. Afterwards baseline measurements will be performed and patients will be randomized 1:1 into the early treatment group or the delayed treatment group in groups of four using sealed envelopes. The early treatment group starts the neurorehabilitation program whereas in the delayed treatment group, patients will be put on a waiting list for two months. After two months, outcome measurements will be collected. Patients of the early treatment group stop the neurorehabilitation program and patients of the delayed treatment group start the neurorehabilitation program for two months ("cross-over design"). Two months after ending the program, each group will be retested.

Primary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes

• Change from baseline in EDSS(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in 25-Foot Walk Test (25-FWT) (Cohen et al. 2014)(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in Coin Rotation Task (Heldner et al. 2014)(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in Timed Up and Go (TUG) (Nilsagard et al. 2007)(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in Rand 36(0 - 2 - 4 months)
• Change from baseline in Nine-hole-Peg Test (NHPT) (Gookin et al. 1988)(0 - 2 - 4 months)