Comparison of two education delivery methods of an image interpretation program for radiographers

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Which method of delivery is most effective in educating radiographers in Image Interpretation; Public Health - Health promotion/education

• Registration Number: ACTRN12612000210875
• Lead Sponsor: Princess Alexandra Hospital

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2012-02-20
• Study Completion: 2018-01-31
• Last Update Posted: 13 January 2020

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 42

Inclusion Criteria

Must be a qualified radiographer

Exclusion Criteria

none

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The primary outcome measure will be the X-ray image bank assessment score[This involves radiographers examining a bank of 60 images, at Baseline, 1 week post education and 3 months post education]

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Secondary outcome measures include radiographers completing two customised structured surveys. <br><br>Both suveys will assess; self-efficacy[one before education commences and one after their final image interpretation assessment.];perceived effectiveness of education[one before education commences and one after their final image interpretation assessment.];confidence levels in interpretation of plain x-rays[one before education commences and one after their final image interpretation assessment.];current involvement in an abnormality highlighting system[one before education commences and one after their final image interpretation assessment.];radiographers preferred mode of education[one before education commences and one after their final image interpretation assessment.]