NCT02952326UnknownNot Applicable
Comparison Of The Effect of Adding XP Endo Finisher To The Irrigation Protocol Versus Conventional Irrigation Method On Post-Operative Flare Ups In Necrotic Teeth
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 34
- Primary Endpoint
- Post-operative pain recorded by the patient using a four step pain scale (0-3)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Comparing the postoperative flare ups and pain after adding the XP Endo Finisher to the final irrigation protocol on necrotic mandibular premolars.
Detailed Description
patients are randomized into 2 groups after meeting the eligibility criteria,
- Each patient will be given pain scale chart in order to record his /her pain level before any intervention.
- The tooth is anesthetized, accessed and mechanical instrumentation to be made 3 A) For the experimental group: The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument. XP Endo finisher is used after the last instrument in preparation
B) For the control group :
The canals will be thoroughly irrigated using 3ml syringe of 2.5% Sodium hypochlorite between every subsequent instrument.
- Obturation is done and postoperative instructions are given to the patient
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 45 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •i. Age between 18-50 years old. ii. Males or Females. iii. mandibular Premolars
- •Asymptomatic.
- •Non-vital response of pulp tissue (negative response).
- •With or without periapical radiolucency.
Exclusion Criteria
- •i. Patients allergic to penicillin. ii. Pregnant females. iii. Patients having significant systemic disorder. iv. If antibiotics have been administrated during the past two weeks preoperatively.
- •v. Patients having bruxism or clenching. vi. Teeth that have :
- •Vital pulp tissues.
- •Association with swelling
- •Acute peri-apical abscess
- •Periodontally affected teeth
- •No possible restorability
- •Previous endodontic treatment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Post-operative pain recorded by the patient using a four step pain scale (0-3)
Time Frame: up to 5 days after the treatment
Secondary Outcomes
- Post-operative swelling(up to 5 days after the treatment)
- Need\ number of Analgesic tablets(up to 5 days after the treatment)
- Need for systemic antibiotics(up to 5 days after the treatment)
Investigators
Ghada Ihab Mohamed
Resident at Endodontic department, faculty of oral and dental medicine
Cairo University
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Postoperative Pain After the Use of Different Last Irrigation Method During Root Canal Treatment in Primary TeethPost Operative PainNCT04197531TC Erciyes University110
Unknown
Not Applicable
Postoperative Pain Following Irrigation With Endodontic Needle, Sonic and Passive Ultrasonic TechniquesTooth,Non-vitalNCT02912286Cairo University57
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Post-operative Pain After Use of Endo-activator and Conventional Irrigation During Endodontic Treatment in Symptomatic Periapical PeriodontitisPost Operative PainEndodontic TreatmentApical PeriodontitisNCT06668662Jinnah Sindh Medical University60
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of transverse abdominis plane block between 0.15% ropivacaine and 0.25% ropivacaine after pediatric unilateral inguinal hernia repair.Diseases of the digestive systemKCT0002176The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital43
Completed
Not Applicable
Addition of MgSO4 or Dexamethasone to Bupivacaine on the Prolongation of Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumboram BlockPost Operative PainNCT05397236Ain Shams University66