Comparison of lidocaine and dexmedetomidine to see anaesthetic sparing effect in laparoscopic surgery
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/10/037396
- Lead Sponsor
- Rajeev Ranjan
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients of ASA physical status I and II.
2. Patients willing to participate.
3. laproscopic surgery of different types under general anesthesia.
4. Patient between 18-65years of either sex .
Exclusion Criteria
a. Patients refusal to participate..
b. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 3 or higher.
c. Patients with known allergy to any of the study drugs and
with cardiac conduction defects.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison between lidocaine vs dexmedetomidine regarding anaesthetic sparing effect in laproscopic surgery. <br/ ><br>1.Propofol induction dose <br/ ><br>2.End tidal isoflurane <br/ ><br>3.Intra operative fentanyl required <br/ ><br>4.Post operatively first analgesic demandTimepoint: anesthesia induction till und of surgery and the time to the first postoperative analgesic requirement in patients who undergo elective laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method â?¢ Peri operative hemodynamic changes <br/ ><br>â?¢ Post operative nausea, vomiting <br/ ><br>â?¢ Bowel function (ileus) <br/ ><br>â?¢ Bradycardia, if anyTimepoint: anesthesia induction till und of surgery and the time to the first postoperative analgesic requirement in patients who undergo elective laparoscopic surgeries under general anesthesia.