Prospective Pilot Study of Multi-actor Tolerance Evaluation Using the VIRARE Device (VIrtual Reality Assisted Rehabilitation) in Visually Impaired Patients
- Conditions
- Visual Impairment
- Interventions
- Device: Virtual reality tests
- Registration Number
- NCT03646786
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
Our study aims to validate the relevance of a virtual reality tool (VIRARE: VIrtual REality Assisted Rehabilitation) in the assessment and rehabilitation of visually impaired subjects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- The patient signed the consent form
- The patient is affiliated to a health insurance programme
- The patient presents ophthalmological or neurological pathologies with impact on visual function (retinopathy pigmentosa, macular dystrophy, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, cerebrovascular accident ...).
- The patient is visually impaired (visual acuity less than 3/10 of both eyes or concentric narrowing of the Goldmann binocular visual field or homonymous hemianopia) of category I, II, III or IV of the WHO classification.
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by another study
- The patient is under safeguard of justice.
- The patient is under judicial protection.
- It is not possible to give the patient (or his/her trusted-person) informed information.
- The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
- The patient has a sensory or cognitive disability with a given scale (MMS < 24)
- The patient has difficulty moving including major locomotor difficulties.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description visually impaired patients Virtual reality tests -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method dizziness felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
Nausea felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
Fear Day 0 Yes/no
Willingness to continue the following tests according to the patient point of view Day 0 Yes/no
head movements of the patient according to the therapist Day 0 Rank: 0-missing, 1-insufficient, 2-medium, 3-suitable
Time lapse to find targets Day 0 minutes
The patient has correctly performed the requested task Day 0 Yes/no
headache felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
Extraocular pain felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
diplopia Day 0 Yes/no
oculomotricity of the patient according to the therapist Day 0 Rank: 0-missing, 1-insufficient, 2-medium, 3-suitable
target tracking by the patient according to the therapist Day 0 0 = 0 target detected
1. 1 or 2 targets detected
2. 3 or 4 targets detected
3. 5 targets detectedThe patient asked for a pause during the test Day 0 Yes/no
The patient went to the right place during the 3rd test Day 0 Yes/no
Cervical pain felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
body movements of the patient according to the therapist Day 0 Rank: 0-missing, 1-insufficient, 2-medium, 3-suitable
watering of the patient Day 0 Yes/no
eye burns felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
amaurosis Day 0 Yes/no
unpleasantness of the session from the patient point of view Day 0 Yes/no
Difficulty of the session according to the patient point of view Day 0 Yes/no
The patient asked to permanently stop the tests Day 0 Yes/no
dazzle felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
Pain due to the mobilization of the eyeballs felt by the patient Day 0 Yes/no
conformity of the session according to the patient point of view Day 0 Yes/no
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Nimes University Hospital
🇫🇷Nîmes, France