Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06119360
NCT06119360CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of the Intubation Success Rate Between Two Techniques Using Lightwand in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: Conventional vs. Face-to-face Technique

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong1 site in 1 country176 target enrollmentStarted: December 12, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
176
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Initial success rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study compares two different approaches of lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients.

Detailed Description

This study compares two approaches in lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients. One is a conventional approach that involves scooping movement with mandible protraction. The other is a face-to-face approach that inserts lightwand with a front-facing position. This study is conducted as a randomized, prospective, single-blinded design.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3
  • •patients who received scheduled spine surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

  • •patients with body mass index <18.5 kg/m2 or >35.0 kg/m2,
  • •patients who previously had head and neck surgery,
  • •patients who are at high risk of aspiration,
  • •patients with pathologic conditions such as tumors, polyps, or inflammation in the airway,
  • •patients who cannot sit due to severe spine deformity,
  • •patients who have compromised cardiopulmonary function patients with clinically significant neurovascular disease

Arms & Interventions

Group Conventional

Other

Conventional approach using group in lightwand intubation

Intervention: Conventional approach (Procedure)

Group Face-to-Face

Other

Face-to-face approach using group in lightwand intubation

Intervention: Face-to-face approach (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Initial success rate

Time Frame: during intubation

Intubation success rate at the first attempt

Secondary Outcomes

  • Intubation time(during intubation)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hyungseok Seo

Assistant professor

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials