跳至主要内容
临床试验/IRCT20190126042496N3
IRCT20190126042496N3招募中未知

Clinical and biomechanical comparison of microscopic bilateral laminotomy versus total laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for decompression of central canal and lateral recess simultaneous stenosis, with a focus on multilevel stenosis: A prospective comparative study.

eurofunctional Research Center of Shohada Tajrish Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 76 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
76

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

年龄范围
30 years 至 75 years(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Between 30- and 75-year-old age
  • Multi-level canal stenosis (= 3 levels)
  • Stenosis of both the central canal (mild to moderate) and the lateral recess simultaneously.
  • Failure of conservative therapy for radicular pain after six months.
  • Radicular pain predominates over claudication(mild).

排除标准

  • Patients with severe stenosis of the central canal.
  • Patients with severe neurogenic claudication suffer from leg pain that limits their ability to stand or walk.
  • Extruded discs or those requiring discectomy
  • Osteoporotic patients with a T score < -1.5
  • Previous spinal surgery history (laminotomy , laminectomy, or posterior spinal fusion )
  • Serious medical conditions such as congestive heart failure, cirrhosis, and other chronic diseases that preclude surgical procedures.
  • Even though patients develop cardiac, renal, or pulmonary disorders during the study, they will be excluded.
  • Current metabolic or rheumatologic and inflammatory disorders requiring corticosteroid consumption.
  • Spinal deformity

研究者

发起方
eurofunctional Research Center of Shohada Tajrish Hospital

相似试验