跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2021/10/037227
CTRI/2021/10/037227尚未招募不适用

Comparative Evaluation of Changes In Incisor Position And Anchorage Loss With Self Ligating Brackets And Conventional Brackets In Non Extraction Cases – A Clinical Study

DR A C Dechamma1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2021年10月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
1.Assess the changes in incisor position and anchorage loss in non extraction cases treated with self ligating brackets.

研究概览

简要总结

Anchorage plays a vital role in orthodontic treatment and anchorage planning helps in achieving stable treatment objectives. Anchorage loss is said to be a potential side effect from the orthodontic mechanotherapy and may lead to suboptimal results. The sliding mechanisms used in  conventional brackets such as MBT develops frictional forces between arch wire and bracket and 60% of the applied force is dissipated as friction resulting in inhibited tooth movement thereby leading to anchorage loss.

Self ligating brackets develop less frictional forces, use lighter forces and align the arch form by arch expansion. However alleviation of crowding in non-extraction cases treated with Damon self ligating brackets is associated with significant changes in the maxillary and mandibular incisor positions and anchorage loss. Only fewer studies have been conducted comparing the changes in incisor position in non-extraction cases treated with Damon self ligating and Conventional MBT brackets.

Therefore the present study will be conducted to assess and compare the changes in  incisor position, amount of anchorage loss and intensity of pain experienced by the patients in non-extraction orthodontic cases treated with Damon Q self ligating brackets and Conventional MBT  Brackets. Anchorage plays a vital role in orthodontic treatment and anchorage planning helps in achieving stable treatment objectives. Anchorage loss is said to be a potential side effect from the orthodontic mechanotherapy and may lead to suboptimal results. The sliding mechanisms used in  conventional brackets such as MBT develops frictional forces between arch wire and bracket and 60% of the applied force is dissipated as friction resulting in inhibited tooth movement thereby leading to anchorage loss.

Hence the need for the present study is to

1.      To assess the changes in  incisor position with self ligating brackets and conventional brackets in non-extraction cases

2.      To assess the amount of anchorage loss with self ligating brackets and conventional brackets in non-extraction cases

3.      To assess the intensity of  pain experienced by the patients with self ligating brackets and conventional brackets in non-extraction cases

4.      To compare the changes in  incisor position, amount of anchorage loss and intensity of  pain experienced between self ligating brackets and conventional brackets in non-extraction cases

5.      To draw clinical inferences from the above

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Other
盲法
Open Label

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 45.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.Patients with mild to moderate maxillary and mandibular dental arch crowding.
  • 2.Male and female patients between the age group of 18 and 45 years.
  • 3.Patients with no clinical signs of periodontal diseases.
  • 4.Patients with no gingivitis or untreated caries.

排除标准

  • 1.Previous history of any orthodontic or orthopedic treatment 2.Presence of supernumerary tooth or any congenital anomalies 3.Any bone pathology, ankylosed teeth.
  • 4.Patients taking drugs modifying normal bone physiology (i.e., bisphosphonates) on or before a period of 3 months.
  • 5.Patients with evidence of bone loss.
  • 6.Patients who have undergone periodontal treatment within three months of baseline examination 7.Systemic disorder that could influence periodontal health.

结局指标

主要结局

1.Assess the changes in incisor position and anchorage loss in non extraction cases treated with self ligating brackets.

时间窗: 18 months

2.Assess the changes in incisor position and anchorage loss in non extraction cases treated with conventional brackets.

时间窗: 18 months

次要结局

  • Compare the changes in incisor position and anchorage loss in non extraction cases treated with self ligating brackets and conventional brackets.(18 months)

研究者

发起方
DR A C Dechamma
申办方类型
Other [self]

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparing the efficiency of two different types of... | 临床试验