Pilot Study to Compare ISOVUE®-250 and VISIPAQUE™ 270 for Motion Artifact and Pain in Peripheral DSA
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00740207
- Lead Sponsor
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare ISOVUE-250 and VISIPAQUE 270 for motion artifact and pain following intraarterial injection for peripheral DSA.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 33
Enroll a patient in this study if the patient meets the following inclusion criteria:
- Provides written Informed Consent and is willing to comply with protocol requirements;
- Is at least 18 years of age;
- Is scheduled to undergo peripheral DSA for the diagnosis and/or treatment (PTA) of PAOD.
Exclude a patient from this study if the patient does not fulfill the inclusion criteria, or if any of the following conditions are observed:
- Is a pregnant or lactating female. Exclude the possibility of pregnancy:
- by testing on site at the institution (serum or urine βHCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of investigational product administration,
- by surgical history (e.g., tubal ligation or hysterectomy),
- post menopausal with a minimum 1 year without menses;
- Has any known allergy to one or more of the ingredients of the investigational products;
- Has a history of severe congestive heart failure [class IV in accordance with the classification of the New York Heart Association (NYHA)]
- Was previously entered into this study or received an investigational compound within 30 days before admission into this study;
- Has a history of hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast agents;
- Has renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD] study equation , );
- Has any medical condition or other circumstances which would significantly decrease the chances of obtaining reliable data, achieving study objectives, or completing the study and/or postdose follow-up examinations.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VISIPAQUE 270 VISIPAQUE 270 - Isovue 250 Isovue 250 -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Level of Pain in the Lower Extremities Scored by the Participants on the Visual Analog Scale Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. Immediately prior to power injection run and again immediately following power injection run Visual Analog Scale: Patients were asked to mark on a 10 centimeter line where their pain was in the lower extremity of interest, in relation to the 2 extremes: no pain (0) on the far left and worst pain (10) on the far right. Pain Severity Scale: (0) None = VAS Score 0; (1) Mild = VAS Score 1-3; (2) Moderate = VAS Score 4-6; (3) Severe = VAS Score 7-10. Patients were assessed immediately prior to injection and again immediately following injection.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Number of Participants With Motion Artifacts Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. Immediately postdose Using the following 5-point scale, the Investigator reviewed the images for motion artifact in vessels distal to the knee: 0 = None; 1 = Mild, not significant; 2 = Significant, but correctable; 3 = Degrades image quality; 4 = Images uninterpretable.
The Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Injection(s) Following Intraarterial Administration of ISOVUE-250 or VISIPAQUE 270 in Peripheral DSA. Immediately postdose The Investigator assessed the images and recorded the number of repeat power injections required due to motion artifacts for each participant.