Comparing antibacterial action and in between appointment pain of herbal irrigant versus 3% sodium hypochlorite as root canal irrigant in lower molars.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K041- Necrosis of pulp
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/10/046344
- Lead Sponsor
- Shreya Volety
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 40
1. Healthy patients (Category: American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1) (ASA
House of Delegates 2014) aged between 18–60 years with mandibular (first
and second) molar teeth diagnosed with pulp necrosis with or without apical
periodontitis.
2. Necrotic pulps as confirmed by negative response to sensitivity pulp tests.
3. Patients with mandibular teeth with or without periapical radiolucency size < 2 mm.
4. A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those
patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.
1. Patients suffering from a significant systemic condition.
2. Patients who received antibiotic therapy within the previous 3 months
3. Teeth with the calcified pulp chamber
4. Teeth that had received previous endodontic treatment
5. Cases showing periodontal pockets deeper than 4mm.
6. Patients on medications such as chemotherapy, anticoagulants, corticosteroids,
bisphosphonates and immunosuppressant drugs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The result of this study will help us to know <br/ ><br>about the antimicrobial efficacy of Triphala as a root canal irrigantTimepoint: baseline, 6hrs, 12hrs, 24hrs, 48hrs
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To know about the inter-appointment pain of Triphala versus 3% sodium <br/ ><br>hypochlorite as root canal irrigant in mandibular molars with necrotic pulpTimepoint: within 7 days