MedPath

4K Versus 3D Total Laparoscopic Bilateral Oophorectomy: Tools in Comparison

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Ovarian Diseases
Registration Number
NCT06750003
Lead Sponsor
Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine
Brief Summary

Evaluate whether the 4K laparoscopic vision system can provide an advantage in performing bilateral oophorectomy procedures for benign conditions carried out by trainee surgeons compared to 3D laparoscopy

Detailed Description

All patients diagnosed with suspected benign ovarian pathology based on preoperative examinations (pelvic Doppler ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or CT scan) and with indication for bilateral laparoscopic adnexectomy will be enrolled in the study. The primary objective of the study is to compare surgical times between the 3D and 4K vision systems in laparoscopic ovarian surgery, specifically in bilateral adnexectomy performed by trainee surgeons. Secondary objectives will include evaluating intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and costs to the healthcare system

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
22
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with benign ovarian pathology requiring bilateral oophorectomy
  • ASA score <3
  • Patients who have signed the appropriate informed consent
  • Patients who are not pregnant or diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease
  • No history of prior major abdominal surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • Suspected neoplastic pathology
  • Patients not eligible for surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
operative timefrom enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months

To compare the operative time of bilateral oophorectomy performed using 3D laparoscopy versus 4K laparoscopy for benign indications, conducted by trainee surgeons.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath