COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF I-GEL INSERTION i.e. STANDARD, ROTATIONAL, TRIPLE AIRWAY MANEUVER IN ANAESTHETISED PARALYSED ADULTS
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: R69- Illness, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: R688- Other general symptoms and signs
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/07/035083
- Lead Sponsor
- DR RPGMC TANDA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patient with ASA 1 and ASA 2
Exclusion Criteria
1.Duration of surgery > 4hrs
2.Presence of sore throat.
3.Anticipated difficult airway.
4.Mouth opening <2.5cm
5.BMI > 35 kg/m2
6.Pregnancy
7.Patient at risk of aspiration eg. patients of gastroesophageal reflux disorder, previous history of PONV and hiatus hernia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method First attempt success rate of i-gel placementTimepoint: 1hr
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Total insertion time <br/ ><br>2.Hemodynamic response during insertion <br/ ><br>3.Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) <br/ ><br>4.Ease of gastric tube insertion <br/ ><br>5.Airway morbidity in terms of bloodstaining and sore throat <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 24hrs