Supreme LMA and Proseal LMA in Prone Anesthetized Patient

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation
• Interventions: Device: Supreme LMA; Device: Proseal LMA

• Registration Number: NCT01814306
• Lead Sponsor: Prince of Songkla University

Brief Summary

There is no significant difference about success rate of two devices.

Detailed Description

There is no significant difference about success rate of two device: efficacy and safety

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2011-10
• Study First Submitted: 2013-02-12
• Status Verified: 2013-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-03-15
• Last Update Submitted: 2013-03-15
• Study First Posted: 2013-03-19
• Last Update Posted: 2013-03-19
• Primary Completion: 2013-04
• Study Completion: 2013-06

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• American Society Anesthesiologists physical status I-III
• Patient undergo elective orthopedics surgery in prone position under general anaesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

• Age <15year
• Non-fast
• Morbid obesity (BMI > 35kg/m2)
• Pregnancy
• Known or predicted difficult airway
• GERD
• History of laryngeal problem (injury,subglottic stenosis)
• Local pharyngeal problem (abscess,tumor)
• Poor dentation
• Pulmonary disease

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Supreme	Supreme LMA	Supreme LMA
Proseal	Proseal LMA	Proseal LMA

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Success rate of insertion (quality of ventilation)	1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Ease of insertion, Complication and Glottic seal pressure	1 year

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University; 🇹🇭 Had yai, Songkhla, Thailand