The Impact of the Attention Training Technique on Attention Control and High Worry

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Excessive Worry

Interventions: Behavioral: Control Condition
Behavioral: Attention Training Technique

Registration Number: NCT03216382

Lead Sponsor: Toronto Metropolitan University

Brief Summary: Excessive and uncontrollable worry has been associated with deficits in attention control. The Attention Training Technique (ATT; Wells, 1990) is a 12-minute audio recording that was developed to train attention control, so that individuals could learn to shift their attention away from maladaptive cognitive processes such as worry. The technique has shown to be promising at reducing symptoms across a variety of mental disorders (Knowles, Foden, El-Deredy, \& Wells, 2016) and is recommended for use in people who suffer from chronic worry. To date, little research has been conducted examining the benefits of using this technique in such a population. The present study aims to examine the immediate and short term effects of weekly ATT practice, compared to a control condition, in a population that suffers from high levels of worry about a variety of topics. About one-hundred participants who suffer from chronic worry will be randomly assigned to listen to the ATT or a control recording, every day for a week. Changes in attention control, worry, and cognitive processes will be examined over the course of the intervention period.

Detailed Description: People who suffer from pathological worry report that they worry to an excessive degree and that they find it very difficult to control their worry. Deficits in attention control may help to explain why people who worry pathologically find it difficult to shift their attention away from their worry, and back to the task at hand. The Attention Training Technique (ATT; Wells, 1990) was developed to train attentional control, so that individuals could learn to shift the focus of their attention away from maladaptive cognitive processes such as worry. Despite being recommended for use in populations that suffer from excessive worry, there is a dearth of research examining the effects of ATT in such a population. The study aims to examine the immediate (during the intervention) and short-term (right after finishing the intervention) effects of listening to the ATT, compared to the control recording, on attention, worry, and other cognitive processes. This will be the first study to our knowledge to examine the effects of 1 week of daily ATT practice in a sample of people who suffer from chronic worry, and will provide important information for optimizing the treatment of worry in this population.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 95

Inclusion Criteria

Score of 65 or higher on the Penn State Worry Questionnaire.
Endorsement of chronic worry as per the description of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

Exclusion Criteria

Has current or past history of psychosis or mania, or endorse symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of a substance use disorder in the past 12 months
Report clinically significant suicidal ideation, intent, or plan
Participants will be excluded if they are currently receiving psychological treatment or counseling (e.g., cognitive behaviour therapy, supportive counseling, etc.), unless this treatment is infrequent (once monthly or less) or the participant has been receiving consistent weekly treatment for at least 12 weeks and still meets all other eligibility criteria
Are taking psychotropic medications and have had a change in dose in the past 12 weeks. If they have recently discontinued a psychotropic medication, they will be included if it has been at least 1 month since discontinuation, or 3 months if they had been taking fluoxetine/Prozac. If a participant is taking benzodiazepines on an 'as needed' basis they will be included and their use of this medication will be noted. Daily benzodiazepine usage will exclude participants, and if participants have ever taken benzodiazepines daily, they must be abstinent for at least one year.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Control Condition	Control Condition	Participants in this arm will listen to the control condition recording. Participants will listen to the recording once in the lab, followed by a week of once/day listening at home for a week. For a week before the intervention, and for the week during the intervention, participants will respond to questions every evening, about their worry and attention that day.
Attention Training Technique	Attention Training Technique	Participants in this arm will listen to the Attention Training Technique. Participants will listen to the recording once in the lab, followed by a week of once/day listening at home for a week. For a week before the intervention, and for the week during the intervention, participants will respond to questions every evening, about their worry and attention that day.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Breathing Focus Task -Negative Intrusions	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Behavioural measure of attention control over worry. Number of negative thought intrusions reported during the post-worry breathing focus period (i.e. a period of focused breathing after a period of worry). Scores range from 0-12. A greater number means more negative thought intrusions.
Daily Worry Questions	Completed every evening for two weeks. The first week will take place before beginning the ATT/ control intervention. The second week will take place during the intervention period.	A daily self-report measure of the frequency, duration, intensity and uncontrollability of worry. Only uncontrollability of worry was used (see Data Analysis Plan for rationale). Scores range from 0-6. Higher scores represent greater uncontrollability of worry.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Past Week	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Self-report measure of the degree of worry experienced over the past week. Scores range from 15 to 75. Higher scores indicate higher worry over the past week.
Self-Attention Rating Scale	Completed before and after listening to the recoding (immediate change) and every evening for two weeks. The first week will take place before beginning the ATT/ control intervention. The second week will take place during the intervention period.	A daily self-report measure of focus of attention (from internal to externally focused). The scale ranges from 0 to 6. 0 represents entirely externally focused and 6 represents entirely internally focused.
Attention Network Task (ANT)	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Behavioural measure of general attentional control, using reaction time. A larger number suggests lower attention control, whereas a smaller number suggests greater attention control.
Metacognition Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30) Cognitive Self Consciousness Subscale	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Self-report measure of focus of attention. Scores range from 6- 24. Greater scores represent greater self-focused attention.
Metacognitions Questionnaire 30 (MCQ-30) Negative Beliefs About the Uncontrollability of Thoughts and Danger Subscale	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Self-report measure of beliefs about the uncontrollability and dangerousness of worry. Scores range from 6-24. Greater scores represent greater negative beliefs about worry.
Attention Control Scale	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Self-report measure of attentional control. Scores range from 20-80. Greater scores indicate greater self-reported attention control.
Dot Probe	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Behavioural measure of attentional bias to threat related words, measured in reaction time. A larger positive number indicates a greater bias to threat information while a negative number indicates the participant was faster to respond to neutral information.
Southampton Mindfulness Questionnaire	Administered three times over the course of two weeks. Changes will be examined from Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Preintervention, 1 week following Baseline) and Visit 2 to Visit 3 (1 week following preintervention).	Self-report measure of mindfulness. Scores range from 0-96. Greater scores indicate greater self-reported mindfulness.