MedPath

Non-Interventional Study (NIS) In Patients With Advanced And/Or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Treated With SUTENT®

Completed
Conditions
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00684645
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

Primary objective: to increase knowledge about safety, tolerability, quality of life and efficacy under conditions of routine use of SUTENT®. Secondary objectives: treatment response, hypothyroidism prevalence.The efficacy will be assessed using the Objective Response Rate, Time to Progression based on the RECIST criteria and the ECOG performance data.

Detailed Description

180 patients will be enrolled at 20 key oncological centres, the sample size is sufficient for exploratory analysis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
186
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • No previous cytokines therapy.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients treated with SUTENT®SUTENTPatients with metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of cytokines therapy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response12 months

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR). CR is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the baseline sum longest dimensions.

Progression-free Survival (PFS)Baseline to measured progressive disease (up to 12 months)

The period from study entry until disease progression, death, or date of last contact.

Overall Survival (OS)Baseline to date of death (up to 12 months)

OS is the duration from enrollment to death.

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Week 6Week 6

Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 3Month 3

Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 6Month 6

Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 9Month 9

Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Month 12Month 12

Following are ECOG grades. 0: Fully active, perform all pre-disease activities without restriction. 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory, carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. 2: Ambulatory, capable of selfcare, unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than (\>) 50% of waking hours. 3: Capable of limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair \>50% of waking hours. 4: Completely disabled, not capable of any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair. 5: Dead. Participants in "Not reported" category were on study, had no data for this time point.

Correlation Between Sunitinib-induced Hypertension and Tumor Response to Treatment (PFS)Baseline to date of first documentation of response to treatment (up to 12 months)

Sunitinib-induced hypertension was determined using blood pressure recorded at each postbaseline visit. Once participants were identified as having sunitinib-induced hypertension, they retained that status at subsequent visits. PFS is the time from start of study treatment to first documentation of tumor response to treatment. Hazard ratio represents the relationship between sunitinib-induced hypertension and PFS (presence/absence of hypertension).

Correlation Between Sunitinib-induced Hypertension and Tumor Response to Treatment (OS)Baseline to date of death (up to 12 months)

Sunitinib-induced hypertension was determined using blood pressure recorded at each postbaseline visit. Once participants were identified as having sunitinib-induced hypertension, they retained that status at subsequent visits. OS is the time from start of study treatment to death. Hazard ratio represents the relationship between sunitinib-induced hypertension and OS.

Percentage of Participants With HypothyroidismBaseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12

TSH and FT4 levels were measured and hypothyroidism was defined as a TSH level \>5.0 mIU/L at that time point.

Percentage of Participants With HypertensionBaseline, Week 6, Months 3, 6, 9, 12

Hypertension was defined as follows. Grade 1: Asymptomatic, transient (less than \[\<\]24 hours) increase by \>20mm Hg (diastolic) or to \>150/100 mm Hg if previously within normal limits (WNL). Grade 2: Recurrent or persistent (24 hours or more) or symptomatic increase by \>20 mm Hg (diastolic) or to \>150/100 mm Hg if previously WNL. Grade 3: Requiring \>1 drug or more intensive therapy than previously. Grade 4: Life-threatening. Grade 5: Death.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pfizer Investigational Site

🇨🇿

Zlin, Czech Republic

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath