MedPath

Effect of Point-of-care Analysis of Ultrasensitive Troponin I on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain (POC Troponina)

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
Troponin I
Point-of-Care Testing
Registration Number
NCT06861582
Lead Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Brief Summary

This clinical study aims to compare two different methods for measuring high-sensitivity troponin I, a key biomarker used to diagnose heart attacks.

The primary research question is: Does the use of the Atellica VTLi kit from Siemens for high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) testing at the point of care (POC) significantly reduce the average time from admission to hospital discharge compared to the conventional laboratory methodology using the Alinity i kit from ABBOTT?

Participant will:

* Patients aged ≥ 18 years.

* Patients arriving in the emergency room with symptoms suggestive of ACS, with onset of pain between 3 and 12 hours after arrival, in whom serial troponin dosing is planned for investigation.

* Signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Researchers will analyze whether the point-of-care testing method helps speed up the hospital discharge process compared to the standard laboratory approach. They will also compare the accuracy of the test results, the time taken for clinical decisions, and the overall cost-effectiveness of the two methods.

Detailed Description

Objective: evaluation of the length of hospital stays for patients with chest pain in the Emergency Unit of the Heart Institute-HCFMUSP, comparing two methods of ultrasensitive troponin I dosage: the Atellica VTLi kit from Siemens, used in the point of care methodology, and the Alinity i kit from ABBOTT, used in the local laboratory. The aim is to compare the time elapsed between admission and discharge in the two groups, seeking to identify possible differences in the efficiency and speed of care provided by each method.

Background: cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of mortality and morbidity in patients admitted to the emergency room with chest pain. Among CVDs, ischemic heart disease is the most lethal, accounting for 38% of all CVD deaths in women and 44% in men. Diagnosis in these cases must be rapid and efficient, since the prognosis improves significantly when treatment is started early in patients with ACS.

Study design: randomized, open, comparative and parallel study at a single center.

Sample size: 200 patients

Intervention: eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 into two groups: the POC dosage group and the control group. In both groups, samples will be taken at time zero and after 1 hour.

Primary outcome: Time between admission of a patient with chest pain symptoms to the emergency department of the Heart Institute-HCFMUSP and discharge after diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients arriving in the emergency room with symptoms suggestive of ACS, with onset of pain between 3 and 12 hours after arrival, in whom serial troponin dosing is planned for investigation.
  • Signature of the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients presenting with ACS with ST-segment elevation on the 12-lead ECG on arrival at hospital.
  • Patients with conditions that interfere with the interpretation of troponin dosage (chronic renal failure, cancer, chronic lung diseases).
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Patients already included in other clinical research protocols.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time between admission of a patient with chest pain symptoms to the emergency department of the Heart Institute-HCFMUSP and discharge after diagnosis of ACS-NSTE.30 days

From emergency department admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days, depending on clinical evolution and treatment approach.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Differences in ultrasensitive troponin values obtained by the two methodsAt the time of randomization (0-hour) and at 1 hour

The primary assessment of ultrasensitive troponin values will occur from the first blood sample collection (0-hour) to the second collection (1-hour). Additional blood samples may be collected if clinically indicated, but only within the hospitalization period.

Differences between time from admission to diagnosis of NSTE ACS30 days

From emergency department admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days, depending on clinical evolution and treatment approach.

Compare the time between blood collection and the result for both groups4 hours

The times at which results become available after each blood sample collection will be assessed, up to 4 hours post-collection.

Determine the time to hospital discharge for patients where ACS has been ruled out (normal hs troponin values)24 hours

From emergency department admission to hospital discharge for patients with normal high-sensitivity troponin (hs-cTn) values, assessed up to 24 hours.

Comparing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)30 days

From emergency department admission to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during hospitalization, assessed up to 30 days

Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of the two diagnostic methods for ultrasensitive troponin measurement30 days

The cost-effectiveness of the two diagnostic methods will be assessed in US dollars using the Brazilian Public Health database. This database includes standardized costs for procedures, medications, and hospital stays, allowing for a comparative economic evaluation between point-of-care and laboratory-based ultrasensitive troponin testing.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Instituto do Coração HCFMUSP

🇧🇷

São Paulo, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath