MedPath

Prospective Study to Compare the Efficacy of E.G.Scan to Detect Barrett's Esophagus Compared With Standard Endoscopy

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Barrett's Esophagus
Interventions
Device: EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy)
Procedure: Standard Endoscopy
Registration Number
NCT02066233
Lead Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a disposable nasal endoscope called "E.G. Scan II" will visualize the esophagus as well as the standard test, sedated endoscopy.

Detailed Description

All subjects underwent two procedures: the E.G.Scan II followed by standard endoscopy in a tandem design. The E.G. Scan II is a transnasal endoscope system to capture and transmit images of the esophagus. Captured images can be reviewed via the E.G. View for diagnosis of diseases related to the esophagus. Generally, the commercial esophagoscope system has reusable probes, but E.G. Scanâ„¢ II has a single use probe because reusable probes have the risk of infection and pollution.

Prior to the E.G.Scan, subjects received a standard prep for the procedure. The two procedures were performed by two different experienced endoscopists who were blinded to the indication of the procedure. At both procedures a note was made of any abnormality of the esophagus. Every subject with an endoscopic diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus had clinical biopsies taken to confirm diagnosis. Subject tolerability was measured with a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Adult participants aged 18 years or above who are scheduled for routine upper GI endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus surveillance, varices surveillance and dyspepsia.
  2. Able and willing to give informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients known to be intolerant to endoscopy.
  2. Patients with frequent epistaxis.
  3. Patients not clinically fit for endoscopy as judged by their care team.
  4. Pregnant women.
  5. Patients with allergy/sensitivity to Simethicone (Mylicon), Phenylephrine, Lidocaine nasal spray, Benzocaine spray (Topex)
  6. Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Subjects with Reflux and/or HeartburnEG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy)All subjects will receive EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) followed by standard endoscopy.
Subjects with Reflux and/or HeartburnStandard EndoscopyAll subjects will receive EG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy) followed by standard endoscopy.
Subjects with Barrett's EsophagusEG Scan II (transnasal endoscopy)All subjects will receive transnasal endoscopy (EG Scan II) followed by standard endoscopy.
Subjects with Barrett's EsophagusStandard EndoscopyAll subjects will receive transnasal endoscopy (EG Scan II) followed by standard endoscopy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Median Tolerability Score on 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Within 48 hours

On the 10-point VAS, 0 represented the "worst experience" and 10 the "best experience."

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Preference for Either of the Two Procedures, EG II Scan Versus Standard EndoscopyTwo weeks

Subjects were asked the following question: "Based on the overall experience (including need for sedation, ability to drive, time off work, procedure comfort, procedure time, etc.). Which procedure would you prefer to have in the future?" Possible answers were: Nasal camera test (EG), oral camera test (Gastroscopy), or either test.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mayo Clinic

đŸ‡ºđŸ‡¸

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath