A Comparative Assessment Of Motor recovery Profile Following Spinal Anaesthesia With doses Of 0.5% Bupivacaine Versus 0.75% Ropivacaine In Perineal Surgeries
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K602- Anal fissure, unspecifiedHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062503
- Lead Sponsor
- Kadhij FathimaM
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. All ASA I, II and III patients planned for Perineal Surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia
2. Duration of surgery less than 2 hours
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patient refusal
2. Patients who are categorized above ASA III
3. Patients with Spine deformities
4. Patients with known allergies to Local Anaesthetics and Fentanyl
5. Patients with known neurological, psychiatric and vestibular disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time of return of ambulation after spinal anaesthesiaTimepoint: At baseline, at the end of surgery, and every 15 minutes post operatively until patient is able to walk without assistance
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Unassisted Sitting <br/ ><br>2.Unassisted Standing <br/ ><br>3.Negative Rhombergs sign <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Time for unassisted sitting unassisted standing Negative Rhombergs test to be achieved after administration of spinal anaesthesia is assessed & compared between two groups at the end of surgery & every 15 minutes postoperatively until patient is able to walk without asssistance <br/ ><br>