Propofol Versus Esketamine for Rapid Sequence Intubation in Critically Ill Patients
Phase 2
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Acute Respiratory Failure
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05092152
- Lead Sponsor
- Federal University of São Paulo
- Brief Summary
Rapid-sequence intubation is routinely performed in critically ill patients. It is unclear whether different sedative agents may influence short-term outcomes after intubation, specially hemodynamic stability.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 170
Inclusion Criteria
- Age above 18 years old
- Physician indicated intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy
- Intubation during cardiac arrest
- Known of suspected intracranial hypertension
- Known allergy to propofol or esketamine
- Bradycardia (heart rate below 50 beats per minute) or atrioventricular block
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Esketamina Esketamine hydrochloride - Propofol Propofol -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lowest mean blood pressure Ten minutes after induction Lowest mean blood pressure
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Severe hypotension One hour Systolic blood pressure below 80 mmHg
Severe hypoxemia One hour Peripheral oxygen saturation below 85%
Number of intubation attempts One hour Number of attempts
Cardiac arrest One hour Cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation
Early death One hour Death within one hour of intubation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Federal University of São Paulo
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil
Federal University of São Paulo🇧🇷São Paulo, BrazilRaysa Schmidt, MDContact