跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01878240
NCT01878240已完成不适用

Prevention of Type II Endoleaks During Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Treatment Versus Combination With Coil Embolisation of the Aneurysmal Sac

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2013年5月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
100
试验地点
6
主要终点
Evaluation at one month the presence or absence of endoleak type II in all patients for each group by Computer Tomography and Doppler.

研究概览

简要总结

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death in older age groups. In the 60-85 year-old population, AAA represents the 14th-leading cause of death. Federal funding through Medicare has been allocated for early detection using abdominal ultrasound screening programs. Despite these more aggressive screening programs and concerted efforts by surgeons for timely repair, the incidence of ruptured AAA has continued to increase.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been the most common type of repair since 2006. Multiple studies reflecting decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality over open repair make this an attractive option for patients. EVAR requires more intensive follow-up than standard open surgical repair, however. Secondary interventions are more common to maintain "seal" of the endograft within the aorta and subsequent exclusion of the aneurysmal component.

The term endoleak is specific to EVAR, and describes the primary means by which endografts fail. Type I endoleaks occur because of inadequate graft seal proximally or distally, resulting in perigraft flow and aneurysm sac pressurization. Type II endoleaks occur when branch arteries arising from the aneurysmal aorta back-bleed into the aneurysm sac due to collateral flow. Type III endoleaks occur when flow persists between segments of a modular graft. Type IV endoleaks occur when flow persists through endograft material (graft porosity). Type V endoleaks have also been called "endotension", and occur when pressurization of the sac occurs in the absence of any demonstrable endoleak. Type I and Type III endoleaks are most concerning for rupture, although persistent Type II endoleaks can also lead to aneurysm rupture and premature death.

The most common method of EVAR follow-up is computed tomographic angiography (CTA). These studies allow accurate measurement of aneurysm sac diameters and volumes. They also are highly sensitive and specific for endoleaks. Type II endoleaks are treated if they remain persistent and are present in the setting of aneurysm sac enlargement. Type I and III endoleaks are immediately treated when identified. Type IV endoleaks are rarely seen with current endograft technology.

详细描述

Study Objectives:

The purpose of the current study is to compare the level of endoleaks between group 1 and 2 at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Study Design Prospective interventional study, multicenter, open, randomized trial comparing the type II endoleak level in patients who benefited the endovascular AAA repair (group 1: without coils) versus combination with coil embolization of the aneurysmal sac (group II: with coils).

The choice of treatment is randomized.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age > 18 years
  • Carrying a sub-renal AAA with a diameter of at least 5 cm at a rate of growth or greater 1cm/an diameter (according to Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations toE VAR treatment),
  • Patients with high risk of type II endoleak (clouding of an aortic aneurysm sac by collateral branch), respondents with at least one of the following criteria on the scanner to be included:
  • The presence of a pair of permeable lumbar arteries.
  • The presence of a patent inferior mesenteric artery.

排除标准

  • Sub renal Collet <10 mm
  • Angulated > 60 °
  • No collateral arising from the aneurysmal sac
  • Iliac aneurysms associated
  • Ruptured AAA
  • Pregnant Women
  • Lack of consent
  • Lack of social security

结局指标

主要结局

Evaluation at one month the presence or absence of endoleak type II in all patients for each group by Computer Tomography and Doppler.

时间窗: 1 month

次要结局

  • • Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -The rate of type II endoleak(6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Mortality and morbidity .(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Number of additional procedures -endovascular -surgical(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -volumetric measurement of the sac aneurysmal(6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Complications of endovascular procedures away from the EVAR -Thrombosis of leg -Limb occlusion -Evolution of the aneurysmal neck(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Monitoring of renal function (creatinine clearance).(1, 6, 12 and 24 months)
  • • Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -Measurement of the maximum transverse aneurysm diameter(6, 12 and 24 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Prevention of Type II Endoleaks During Endovascular... | 临床试验