Shared Decision Making With Breast Cancer Patients
- Conditions
- Breast NeoplasmsShared Decision MakingRadiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Shared decision making supported by an in-consultation patient decision aid
- Registration Number
- NCT04177628
- Lead Sponsor
- Vejle Hospital
- Brief Summary
The aim of this project is to elucidate whether the use of shared decision making will influence patient engagement in the decision making process about adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery for local breast cancer or early stages of local breast cancer.
- Detailed Description
The risk of recurrence of breast cancer is lowered by adjuvant medical treatment as well as by radiotherapy (RT). On the other hand, all adjuvant treatments involve a risk of side effects; some are acute and transient while others are long-term. Considering the well-known side effects of irradiation, it seems appropriate to involve patients in the decision on whether to receive irradiation.
In the shared decision making (SDM) process clinicians and patients work together to make appropriate health decisions based on clinical evidence and the patient's informed preferences. A patient decision aid (PtDA) is instrumental in the SDM process.
This study is a multicenter, national trial randomizing doctors to either use or not use SDM and a PtDA when informing the patients about benefits and risks of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.
It is not expected that significantly less patients will receive radiotherapy as a consequence of SDM. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether patient engagement in decision making is affected by SDM and the use of an in-consultation PtDA.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 678
- Histologically verified breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ breast cancer
- Candidate for adjuvant radiotherapy Danish Breast Cancer Group type F after breast-conserving surgery for T1-2, N0-Nmi, M0 disease according to national guidelines.
- Signed confirmation of participation.
- Bilateral breast cancer or suspicion of disseminated cancer
- Unable to understand the information, the planned treatment or follow-up for any reason.
- Earlier radiotherapy towards the thoracic region.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Arm A: Shared decision making Shared decision making supported by an in-consultation patient decision aid Patients will be informed by a doctor randomized to practice shared decision making and use the in-consultation PtDA during the consultation on adjuvant radiotherapy.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Participant engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire 9. Within one week after the consultation Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The doctor's perception of patient engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire doctor 9 Within one week after the consultation Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the Shared Decision Making Process 4 questionnaire Within one week after the consultation Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 4. The higher the score the more patient engagement.
The participant's regret of the treatment decision as measured by the Decision Regret Scale questionnaire Six months after the consultation Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more regret.
The participant's engagement in the decision making process as measured by the CollaboRATE questionnaire Within one week after the consultation Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 9. The higher the value the more patient engagement.
The participant's fear of cancer recurrence as measured by the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Short form Questionnaire Within one week after the consultation and again after six months Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 36. The higher the value the more fear of recurrence.
The participant's effectiveness in decision making as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire Before (12 items) and within one week after the consultation (all 16 items) Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more effective decision making.
The participant's quality of life as measured by the EORCT QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) questionnaire, only question 29 + 30 Six months Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 100. The higher the value the more quality of life.
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
Aalborg Hospital
π©π°Aalborg, Denmark
Aarhus University Hospital
π©π°Aarhus, Denmark
Odense University Hospital
π©π°Odense, Denmark
Rigshospitalet
π©π°Copenhagen, Denmark
Herlev University Hospital
π©π°Herlev, Denmark
Sjaellands University Hospital
π©π°NΓ¦stved, Denmark
Vejle Hospital
π©π°Vejle, Denmark