跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02658058
NCT02658058已完成不适用

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pre-procedural Ultrasound Techniques Versus the Conventional Landmark Technique of Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

American University of Beirut Medical Center1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 180 人开始时间: 2015年11月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
180
试验地点
1
主要终点
Rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt

研究概览

简要总结

Traditionally, spinal anesthesia is performed using the palpation of bony landmark to identify the level and point of entry of the spinal needle. Recently, ultrasound imaging has become an increasingly popular procedure among anesthesiologists to guide neuraxial blockade. Most of the studies on pre-procedural ultrasound-guided neuraxial techniques are limited to a midline approach using a transverse median views. The parasagittal oblique view consistently offers better ultrasound view of the neuraxis compared to the transverse median view. However, it is still not evident whether these superior parasagittal oblique views will lead to an easier paramedian needle insertion. In the literature, there are no studies directly comparing the US-guided paramedian approach using the parasagittal oblique (PSO) view, the US-guided midline approach using the transverse median view, and the conventional landmark midline approach to perform spinal anesthesia in the elderly patients, in particular for the teaching of novice anesthesia residents.

详细描述

The aim of this study is to find out the optimal technique to perform spinal anesthesia by residents in training. Thus the investigators will compare preprocedural ultrasound-guided paramedian technique using parasagittal oblique view vs preprocedural ultrasound-guided midline technique using transverse median view vs landmark-guided midline technique of spinal anesthesia in the elderly population. Our hypothesis is that both preprocedural US-guided techniques are superior to the conventional landmark-guided midline technique with regard to ease of performance defined as success rate at first attempt, number of puncture attempts, spinal procedure time, and patient satisfaction.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients scheduled for surgery amenable to spinal anesthesia, aged more than 60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 4.

排除标准

  • Patients who are unable to give consent, refuse spinal anesthesia, have spinal abnormalities (including scoliosis and previous spine operations with instrumentation) or have contraindications to spinal anesthesia, including allergy to local anesthetics or a bleeding diathesis

研究组 & 干预措施

Landmark technique

Active Comparator

As intervention, patients in this group are administered landmark guided midline spinal anesthesia.

干预措施: Landmark technique (Other)

Ultrasound-guided paramedian technique

Experimental

As intervention, patients in this group are administered spinal anesthesia based on preprocedural ultrasound-guided paramedian technique using parasagittal oblique view

干预措施: Ultrasound-guided paramedian technique (Other)

Ultrasound-guided midline technique

Experimental

As intervention, patients in this group are administered spinal anesthesia based on preprocedural ultrasound-guided midline technique using transverse median view

干预措施: Ultrasound-guided midline technique (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt

时间窗: up to 5 minutes from the start of insertion of the introducer of the spinal needle

Rate of successful dural puncture on the first needle insertion attempt which is defined as the percentage of successful dural puncture on the first introducer needle advancement through skin; each skin puncture by introducer is considered as a needle insertion attempt.

次要结局

  • patient satisfaction(5 min after completion of administration of SA:)
  • Number of spinal needle redirections(45 minutes)
  • Number of introducer needle insertion attempts(45 minutes from the start of insertion of introducer of the spinal needle)
  • spinal procedure time(60 minutes)
  • overall success rate in every technique(60 minutes from the start of insertion of introducer of the spinal needle)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sahar Sayyid

MD

American University of Beirut Medical Center

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验