COMPARISION OF TWO TECHNIQUES FOR ASSISTING FIBREOPTIC OROTRACHEAL INTUBATIO
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/11/047520
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of anaesthesia
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
â?? ASA I &; II
â?? Healthy and Intact incisors.
â?? Modified Mallampati classification â?? I & II
â?? No artificial denture.
â?? No loose teeth.
â?? Normal neck movements (flexion and extension)
â?? No dislocation of temporomandibular joint.
â?? Normal upper lip bite test.
â?? Requiring general anaesth
Exclusion Criteria
â?? Known patients of CVS, CNS, Respiratory, GIT Disorders.
â?? Absent teeth
â?? Artificial denture
â?? BMI >30 Kg/m2
â?? Bronchial asthma
â?? Cervical spine disease
â?? Difficult airway
â?? Hypertension
â?? Loose or missing incisors / Loose Teeth
â?? Modified Mallampati Classification III and IV
â?? Presence of facial hair.
â?? Temporomandibular joint abn
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparision of Upper Incisors Pull Back technique and Jaw Thrust manoeuvre on improvement in laryngeal view pre and post manoeuvre as per Cormack Lehane Grading and percentage of glottis opening score (POGO) during fiber optic orotracheal intubation under general anaesthesiaTimepoint: Laryngeal view pre and post manoeuvre
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method â?? Number of attempts . <br/ ><br>â?? Time taken to achieve a satisfactory laryngeal view. <br/ ><br>â?? Hemodynamic parameters (HR, MBP, SPO2). <br/ ><br>â?? Time taken for railroading of endotracheal tube onto fiberscope. <br/ ><br>â?? Capnographic confirmation of endotracheal tube placement. <br/ ><br>â?? Total time taken for successful intubation <br/ ><br>â?? Any injury during intubation.Timepoint: Real time