GlideScope Groove vs. Standard GlideScope: A Non-inferiority Study
- Conditions
- Intubation, Orotracheal
- Interventions
- Device: GlideScope Groove
- Registration Number
- NCT01489605
- Lead Sponsor
- Lawson Health Research Institute
- Brief Summary
Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation will be randomized to being intubated with either the GlideScope Groove video-laryngoscope or the standard GlideScope video-laryngoscope.
- Detailed Description
See above. The primary outcome is time to intubation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- WITHDRAWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
- Any adult patient booked for elective surgery requiring orotracheal intubation.
- Any patient with cervical spine abnormalities.
- Any patients with known or probable difficult airways.
- Any patient requiring rapid sequence induction.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description GlideScope Groove GlideScope Groove Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope Groove device. (Verathon)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of Intubation Day 1 Duration of Intubation - Mask removal to ETCO2 confirmation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sore Throat Day 3 Patients will be surveyed with respect to the incidence of post-operative sore throat.
Incidence of trauma Day 1 Incidence of trauma
Ease of intubation Day 1 Ease of intubation as noted by operator (measured on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale)
Number of failures to intubate Day 1 Number of failures to intubate
Use of external laryngeal pressure Day 1 Use of external laryngeal pressure
Laryngoscopic grade distribution Day 1 Laryngoscopic grade distribution according to Cormack and Lehane classification
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
London Health Sciences Center University Hospital
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre Victoria Campus
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada