Impact of Perioperative Analgesia in Prostatectomy Patients on Early Quality of Recovery (SPITALIDO)
- Conditions
- ProstatectomyPain
- Registration Number
- NCT03618693
- Lead Sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Brief Summary
The rationale behind this RCT is to assess within 24 hours after surgery the quality of recovery of prostatectomy patients treated with 3 different analgesia concepts (intraoperative spinal analgesia, transversus abdominis plane block, intravenous lidocaine administration) using the quality of recovery (QoR) 15 questionnaire.
- Detailed Description
Prostatectomy (open or robotic assisted) is a major urological surgery, which is associated with relevant acute postoperative pain. Perioperative analgesic techniques aiming at optimizing postoperative analgesia have to be investigated. Optimal postoperative pain management is one of the key factors leading to enhanced recovery after surgery. Optimal analgesia should aim for optimized patient comfort, fast functional recovery with the fewest side effects thus encouraging the DREAMS concept (DRinking, EAting, Mobilizing and Sleeping).
The perioperative additional use of a spinal single shot analgesia, or a transversus abdominis plane block to general anaesthesia are validated options to enhance pain therapy compared to systemic analgesia alone. However, if the impact on pain scores has been described previously, the impact on the quality of recovery (QoR) is still unclear. Using the assessment of QoR allows for a much more objective and broader assessment of the quality of the postoperative treatment. Indeed, patient's perioperative experience cannot be only focused on pain scores but should involve items like physical independence, patient support, comfort, emotion. All these items are included in already validated QoR questionnaires like the QoR 15 or QoR 40.
The rationale behind this randomized, parallel group, single centre, interventional, active controlled trial is to assess with the QoR 15questionnaire within 24 hours after surgery the quality of recovery of prostatectomy patients treated with 3 different analgesia concepts.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 142
- Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
- >18 years old
- eGFR >40ml/min
- Normal liver function
- Prostatectomy (open, robotic assisted)
- Contraindications to the class of drugs under study, e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to class of drugs or the investigational product,
- Patients with regular use of antiemetics, laxatives, opioids or other types of analgesics
- Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse,
- Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
- Participation in another study with investigational drug within the 30 days preceding and during the present study,
- Previous enrolment into the current study,
- Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons,
- Severe psychiatric disorder
- Patients with chronic pain
- Preoperative regular use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- Refusal of regional analgesia (SSS or TAP block)
- Contraindication to regional analgesia (SSS or TAP block)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quality of Recovery From preoperative to postoperative day (POD) 1 i.e. within 24 hours after initiation of intervention Changes in Quality of Recovery using the validated 15 items quality of recovery (QoR-15) score : QoR is a patient reported outcome short questionnaire that measure the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. It incorporates 5 dimensions of health (patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, pain). This is a shortened validated version of the QoR 40 including 15 items. QoR-15, with a score range from 0 to 150, is easy to perform. Recently a meta-analysis showed that QoR 15 fulfils requirements for outcome measurement instruments.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) during the first 48 hours postoperatively Groups will be assessed for postoperative nausea/vomiting by verbal descriptive scale at 6, 24 and 48 hours respectively.
Verbal descriptive Scale
0 No nausea
1. Mild nausea
2. Moderate nausea
3. Frequent vomiting
4. Severe vomitingPain Score within 6 hours postoperatively, on POD 1 and 2 Pain will be assessed with the use of pain scores (incisional pain, "deep" visceral pain and pain during coughing/mobilization) according to the validated numeric rating scale (NRS with a range of 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximal pain)).
Gastrointestinal Function During length of stay, expected to be on average 5 to 7 days Return of gastrointestinal function (first flatus, first defecation, tolerance to food) in days.
Opioid Consumption Within the first 48 hours postoperatively Use/amount of opioids intraoperative and postoperatively (transformed in morphine equivalent per 24 hours)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Patrick Wuethrich, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Bern Inselspital Bern
🇨🇭Bern, BE, Switzerland
Patrick Wuethrich, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Bern Inselspital Bern🇨🇭Bern, BE, Switzerland