Comparison between Two Gum Surgery Procedures.

Not Applicable

• Registration Number: CTRI/2019/01/016994
• Lead Sponsor: Vandana Daga

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Last Update Posted: 24 November 2021

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot Yet Recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 0

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who agree to participate in the study by signing the informed consent.

2. Presence of at least two bilateral maxillary and/or mandibular gingival recessions fulfilling Cairo classification of RT1 and RT2.18

3. Difference in depth of the gingival recessions between the right & left side <=1mm & difference in clinical attachment <=2mm.

4. Probing depth less than 3mm & full mouth plaque score <20%, full mouth gingival index score <20%.

5. Properly aligned teeth in the arch without any malposition.

6. Cervical abrasions in area of gingival recession will be treated and included.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with systemically compromised health & contraindicated for periodontal surgery.

2. Periodontal surgical treatment during the previous 24 months on the involved sites.

3. Current pregnancy or lactation.

4. Patient with smoking habit or tobacco chewers.

5. Fixed orthodontic or removable appliance

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
clinical attachment level <br/ ><br>recession depth <br/ ><br>recession width <br/ ><br>gingival thickness <br/ ><br>width of attached gingivaTimepoint: baseline, 3 months, 6 months <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
root coverage esthetic score <br/ ><br>patient reported outcomes of post operative morbidity and esthetics <br/ ><br>probing depthTimepoint: baseline, 3 months and 6 months