Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05053568
NCT05053568
Active, Not Recruiting
N/A

Advanced Image Supported Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

UMC Utrecht7 sites in 1 country130 target enrollmentFebruary 8, 2021
ConditionsHeart Failure

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Heart Failure
Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Enrollment
130
Locations
7
Primary Endpoint
Differences in % of patients with succesfull LV lead location
Status
Active, Not Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established pacemaker therapy for patients with symptomatic chronic heart failure, but is hampered by a non-response rate of 30-40%. Optimising left ventricular (LV) lead placement is the cornerstone of improving treatment. The optimal location for the lead is remote from scar but within segments demonstrating late electromechanical activation. The present study aims to investigate the efficacy and clinical effect of the use of real-time guided lead placement using cardiac MRI and fluoroscopy in a blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 8, 2021
End Date
October 2025
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

M. Meine

Principal Investigator (MD, PhD)

UMC Utrecht

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Heart failure with LV ejection fraction ≤ 35%;
  • New York Heart Association class II, III, or IV (ambulatory);
  • Optimal medical treatment that is tolerable;
  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS ≥ 130 ms, OR non-LBBB and QRS ≥ 150 ms.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Subjects with impaired renal function (severe renal insufficiency, GFR \< 30 ml/min/1.73m2);
  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial fibrillation during MRI
  • Documented allergic reaction to gadolinium;
  • Impossibility to undergo an MRI scan;
  • Participation in another clinical study that prohibits any procedures other than standard.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Differences in % of patients with succesfull LV lead location

Time Frame: Direct post-CRT

Lead location, defined as being within, adjacent, or remote from the pre-defined target.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire(6, 12 and 24 months)
  • Change in EQ-5D-5L(6, 12 and 24 months)
  • Change in reverse remodelling and volumetric response(6 months)
  • Health Technology Assessment(24 months)
  • Change in CRT response score(12 months)

Study Sites (7)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials