Evaluation of Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring Device (HemoVista™) in the Clinical Filed
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Complication
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- degree of agreement in cardiac output
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
In patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, the clinical utility of non-invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment using HemoVista is compared with invasive hemodynamic status monitoring equipment FloTrac.
Detailed Description
For patients who are scheduled to monitor invasive blood pressure, invasive hemodynamic monitoring using FloTrac and additional HemoVista sensors are attached and output data are obtained at the same time during general anesthesia. FloTrac is used to conduct conventional anesthesia and fluid therapy, and the accuracy of HemoVista, a non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring equipment, is compared through prospective observational studies.
Investigators
Hee-Soo Kim
professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adult patients aged 20 or older who undergo surgery under general anesthesia for more than two hours
- •invasive close hemodynamic monitoring with FloTrac is needed
Exclusion Criteria
- •problems in site where HemoVista is attached
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
degree of agreement in cardiac output
Time Frame: during surgery
degree of agreement in cardiac output between HemoVista and FloTrac