Comparison Between Two Coronally Positioned Flap With Connective Tissue
- Conditions
- Gingival RecessionPeriodontal Atrophy
- Registration Number
- NCT01814592
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of total root coverage between two coronally positioned flap technique in Miller recession Class I and II, in patients attending at "Universidad El Bosque" dental school clinics.
- Detailed Description
This is a blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 72
- Class I and II Miller recessions showing a recession depth ≥ 2 mm.
- Recessions isolated and / or maximum continuous two teeth.
- Recessions in incisors, canines and premolars
- Patients 20 to 60 years old.
-
Systemic compromise, that contraindicates any periodontal surgical procedure.
- Warfarin medication.
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 8
- Chronic steroid therapy (dose of 7.5 mg/ day for more than 14 days)
- HIV-AIDS infection with CD4 counts <200.
- Immunosuppression.
-
Recessions molars not be taken into account in the study.
-
Patients who have used antibiotics one month prior to the surgical procedure.
-
Pregnancy.
-
Active smoker.
-
Patients with a history of periodontal surgery at the recession area that has taken place in the last three months.
-
Severe dental malposition, teeth rotation, versions teeth root coverage that contraindicates surgery.
-
Non carious cervical lesions or caries where is not visible the cemento- enamel junction (CEJ).
-
Active inflammation that contraindicates surgical procedure of the recession.
-
Active Orthodontics
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess percentage of total root coverage between two subepithelial conective tissue graft technique for covering Class I and II Miller recessions patients attending at dental clinics of "Universidad El Bosque" one month (plus or minus 2 days), three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six months (plus or minus 5 days)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assess the proportion of root coverage one month (plus or minus 2 days), Three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six month (plus or minus 5 days) Clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue and the position of the mucogingival junction following root coverage procedures one month (plus or minus 2 days), three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six months (plus or minus 5 days)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Universidad El Bosque
🇨🇴Bogotá, D. C., Colombia
Universidad El Bosque🇨🇴Bogotá, D. C., Colombia