Comparison of Two Bilaminar Techniques for Root Covering of Miller´s Recessions Class I and II: A Blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá1 site in 1 country72 target enrollmentMarch 2013

ConditionsGingival Recession Periodontal Atrophy

Overview

Phase: Phase 2
Intervention: Not specified
Conditions: Gingival Recession
Sponsor: Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá
Enrollment: 72
Locations: 1
Primary Endpoint: Assess percentage of total root coverage between two subepithelial conective tissue graft technique for covering Class I and II Miller recessions patients attending at dental clinics of "Universidad El Bosque"
Last Updated: 13 years ago

Overview Investigators Eligibility Criteria Outcomes Sites Similar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of total root coverage between two coronally positioned flap technique in Miller recession Class I and II, in patients attending at "Universidad El Bosque" dental school clinics.

Detailed Description

This is a blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Registry

clinicaltrials.gov

Start Date

March 2013

End Date

August 2014

Last Updated

13 years ago

Study Type

Interventional

Study Design

Parallel

Sex

All

Investigators

Sponsor

Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá

Responsible Party

Principal Investigator

Sergio Iván Losada Amaya

Professor, DDS, specialist in periodontics and oral medicine

Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

•Class I and II Miller recessions showing a recession depth ≥ 2 mm.
•Recessions isolated and / or maximum continuous two teeth.
•Recessions in incisors, canines and premolars
•Patients 20 to 60 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

•Systemic compromise, that contraindicates any periodontal surgical procedure.
•Warfarin medication.
•Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with glycosylated hemoglobin ≥ 8
•Chronic steroid therapy (dose of 7.5 mg/ day for more than 14 days)
•HIV-AIDS infection with CD4 counts \<
•Immunosuppression.
•Recessions molars not be taken into account in the study.
•Patients who have used antibiotics one month prior to the surgical procedure.
•Pregnancy.
•Active smoker.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Assess percentage of total root coverage between two subepithelial conective tissue graft technique for covering Class I and II Miller recessions patients attending at dental clinics of "Universidad El Bosque"

Time Frame: one month (plus or minus 2 days), three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six months (plus or minus 5 days)

Secondary Outcomes

Assess the proportion of root coverage(one month (plus or minus 2 days), Three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six month (plus or minus 5 days))
Clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue and the position of the mucogingival junction following root coverage procedures(one month (plus or minus 2 days), three months (plus or minus 3 days) and six months (plus or minus 5 days))