Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03226600
NCT03226600
Completed
Not Applicable

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROOT COVERAGE USING OrACELL™ VERSUS SUBEPITHELIAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Texas A&M University0 sites24 target enrollmentMarch 26, 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Gingival Recession
Sponsor
Texas A&M University
Enrollment
24
Primary Endpoint
Gingival Recession (Root Coverage)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose was to compare root coverage outcomes between autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) and decellularized human dermis (OrACELL™) in areas of facial gingival recession.

Detailed Description

Twenty-four non-smoking, healthy patients, with 2mm or greater facial gingival recession at a minimum of one site that classified as a Miller Class I, II, or III recession defect were included. Patients were randomly assigned to either control (CTG) or OrACELL™ (test) groups, which were treated with identical surgical techniques. All root coverage clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline, 3-, and 6-months.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 26, 2015
End Date
December 16, 2016
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must be between 18 and 80 years old, with recession present in one quadrant as either single or multiple buccal vertical recession sites
  • The defect must be at least 2mm in length, (measured from the CEJ to the midfacial gingival margin) and classified as either Miller Class I, II or III
  • Study is limited to vital and nonvital incisors, canines, and premolars
  • If teeth adjacent to the site to be treated had recession as well, they were included in the grafting procedure but not included in measurement
  • Plaque control defined as modified O'Leary Index of 85% was established before surgical intervention
  • Only sites with probing depths of 3mm or less and no bleeding on probing were accepted for surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who smoke more than ten cigarettes per day or use nicotine replacement therapy
  • History of previous history of surgery performed at surgical sites included in study
  • Subjects who have uncontrolled or poorly controlled systemic conditions that could compromise or contraindicate periodontal surgery
  • Non-English speakers
  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Immunosuppressant medications

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Gingival Recession (Root Coverage)

Time Frame: 6 months

The measurement in millimeters of the relationship of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) to the gingival margin

Similar Trials