NCT02916186
Unknown
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix With Tunnel Technique in Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions (Randomized Clinical Trial, Parallel Design)
ConditionsGingival Recession
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 68
- Primary Endpoint
- patient Satisfaction .
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of the present study is to compare the amount of root coverage resulting from subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix associated with tunnel technique among patients suffering from multiple gingival recession.
Detailed Description
Acellular dermal matrix with Tunnel technique will offers great advantages for patients with multiple gingival recession as regards decrease surgical time, Post-Operative pain and root coverage, clinical attachment level, width of Keratinized gingiva, gingival biotype compared to subepithelial connective tissue graft with Tunnel technique.
Investigators
Fatema Mohammed Ali Elmahdi
Dr
Cairo University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Subjects with facial multiple gingival recession defects classified as either class I or II defects according to Miller's classification (Miller 1985).
- •Subjects aged between 18 - 60 years old.
- •Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of tissue, and predictable outcome.
- •Patients with good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Current and former smokers.
- •Pregnant females.
- •Subjects received any periodontal therapy for minimum of 6 months prior to the study.
- •Subjects taking drugs known to interfere with wound healing.
- •Subjects with unacceptable oral hygiene with plaque index \>
- •Teeth with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL), cervical caries and malalignment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
patient Satisfaction .
Time Frame: 1 year
measured by VAS scale
Secondary Outcomes
- root coverage(1 year)
- Gingival Bio-type(1 year)
- Width of Keratinized Tissue(1 year)
- Clinical Attachment Level(1 year)
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Tuberosity Versus Palatal Connective Tissue Graft on the Treatment of Single Maxillary Recession-type DefectsGingival Recession, LocalizedNCT06404762Gazi University30
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Root coverage using subepithelial connective tissue grafts from different layers of the masticatory mucosa at the hard palate: a randomized controlled trial assessing clinical, volumetric, histomorphometric and patient-centered outcomesREZESSIONSDECKUNGDRKS00024587Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Campus Niederrad Zentrum der Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde Carolinum Zahnärztliches Universitäts-Institut gGmbH14
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of thick and thin graft for root coverageGingival RecessionC07.465.714.258.447RBR-6y4r29niversidade de São Paulo
Completed
Not Applicable
Evaluation of Root Coverage by Connective Graft and Different Root Conditioning MethodsGingival RecessionNCT03095378University of Sao Paulo14
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparison of different materials for the treatment of lowering of gumsHealth Condition 1: K060- Gingival recessionCTRI/2023/08/056587Shweta Ahlawat