Pictorial Warning Labels & Memory for Relative & Absolute Cigarette Health-risk Information Over Time in Adult Smokers
- Conditions
- Smoking CessationSmoking, Cigarette
- Interventions
- Behavioral: low arousal graphic PWLBehavioral: high arousal graphic PWLBehavioral: text-only PWLBehavioral: absolute riskBehavioral: relative risk
- Registration Number
- NCT03499340
- Lead Sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Brief Summary
Pictorial cigarette warning labels (PWLs) are thought to increase risk knowledge, but experimental research has not examined PWLs' longer term effects on memory for health risks. In this study, adult smokers are repeatedly exposed to text-only vs. low arousal graphic vs. high arousal graphic warning labels paired with numeric risk information. This study will allow the investigators to assess the extent to which reactions to warnings remain consistent over time and influence smoking risk perceptions and quit intentions. The investigators will also assess the impact of graphic images on memory for smoking risk information presented in absolute (a smoker's lifetime risk of getting a smoking related disease) versus relative (a smoker's risk of getting a smoking related disease, compared to the risk of non-smokers) formats.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 3213
- have smoked 100+ lifetime cigarettes
- currently smoke "every day" or "some days."
- have not ever smoked a cigarette
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- FACTORIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Low arousal graphic PWL, absolute risk low arousal graphic PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a low arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Text-only PWL, absolute risk absolute risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Text-only PWL, relative risk relative risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease High arousal graphic PWL, absolute risk high arousal graphic PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a high arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease High arousal graphic PWL, absolute risk absolute risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a high arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Text-only PWL, absolute risk text-only PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Text-only PWL, relative risk text-only PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, without a graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Low arousal graphic PWL, absolute risk absolute risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a low arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Low arousal graphic PWL, relative risk low arousal graphic PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a low arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease Low arousal graphic PWL, relative risk relative risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a low arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease High arousal graphic PWL, relative risk relative risk Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a high arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease High arousal graphic PWL, relative risk high arousal graphic PWL Exposure to FDA-mandated warning labels, paired with a high arousal graphic image, accompanied by risk information about smoker's risk and non-smoker's risk of a smoking-related disease
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method numeric risk recognition measured immediately following last exposure Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method numeric risk recognition measured after 6-week delay Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers for each label (e.g., ____% of smokers die before age 85). For each question, there were four decoy responses.
relative risk recognition measured after 6-week delay Participants answered one multiple choice question about the numeric risk for smokers vs. nonsmokers for each health risk (e.g., a smoker is ____ as likely to die from heart disease as a nonsmoker). For each question, there were three decoy responses (e.g., for heart disease, response options were: "about as likely," "1.75 times," "4.1 times," "10.4 times").
risk recognition measured after 6-week delay Participants were given a list of 9 warnings and asked to select which ones they'd been previously exposed to
smoking risk perceptions measured after 6-week delay Participants completed several scale items about how much risk they perceived smoking posed to them (e.g., "If a person smokes at your age, how likely are they to get a life-threatening illness from smoking someday ?" \[1=very unlikely; 5=extremely likely\])
quit intentions (for next 30 days) measured after 6-week delay Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within the next 30 days" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)
quit intentions (for next year) measured after 6-week delay Participants intentions to quit smoking; self-reported likelihood of smoking "within next year" (-3 = very unlikely, 3 = very likely)
feelings about smoking measured after 6-week delay Participants completed several scale items about their feelings towards smoking (e.g., "How good or bad do you feel about smoking?" -2=very bad; +2=very good; "How much do you feel confused about the harms vs. benefits of smoking?" 0=not at all confused; 4=very confused)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States