MedPath

Transperitoneal vs Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy

Not Applicable
Conditions
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Interventions
Procedure: Laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy
Registration Number
NCT02849119
Lead Sponsor
Samsung Medical Center
Brief Summary

Both laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) can be performed through transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) approach. RP approach is less utilized than TP approach because of technical difficulties when using rigid laparoscopic instruments in the small space of retroperitoneum cavity. However, with advanced surgical skills and thoughtful patient selection, RP approach may be associated with shorter operative time (OT), less estimated blood loss (EBL), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) compared with TP approach.

Therefore, the investigators performed randomized control trial to compare the outcomes of the two approaches (TP-LPN or RPN vs RP-LPN or RPN).

Detailed Description

Partial nephrectomy is the standard treatment for small renal masses. The evolution of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy led to widespread utilization of laparoscopic (LPN) and robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Both LPN and RPN can be performed through transperitoneal (TP) or retroperitoneal (RP) approach. RP approach is less utilized than TP approach because of technical difficulties when using rigid laparoscopic instruments in the small space of retroperitoneum cavity. However, with advanced surgical skills and thoughtful patient selection, RP approach may be associated with shorter OT, less EBL, shorter LOS compared with TP approach.

Therefore, the investigators performed randomized control trial to compare the outcomes of the two approaches (TP-LPN or RPN vs RP-LPN or RPN).

The purpose of this study To compare the treatment outcomes of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during LPN or RPN in treatment of small renal masses.

Inclusion criteria During the study period, a small renal mass (less than 4cm, T1a stage) patients are going to underwent LPN or RPN.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who underwent radical nephrectomy

2. Patients with bilateral renal masses

3. Patients with a solitary kidney

4. Patients reject a written informed consent

5. Pregnancy

The number of target subjects More than 106 patients who meet the inclusion criteria

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
106
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients are going to undergo LPN or RPN with renal mass =<4cm
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Bilateral renal masses Solitary kidney Previous underwent nephrectomy refuse to be enrolled the study pregnancy
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Transperitoneal approachLaparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomyLaparoscopic or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy through transperitoneal approach
Retroperitoneal approachLaparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomyLaparoscopic or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy through retroperitoneal approach
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Operative timeIntraoperative

Operative time of partial nephrectomy

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Warm ischemic time (minutes)Intraoperative

Vessel clamping time during partial nephrectomy

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by Clavien-Dindo classificationfrom date of surgery, to 1 year postoperatively
Change of differential glomerular filtration rate (dGFR) measured by renal scanPreoperative dGFR and postoperative 1 year
Overall disease-free survival time (month)from date of surgery, to 1 year postoperatively

Disease free means no local recurrence, no metastasis.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Samsung Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath