Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00424320
NCT00424320
Unknown
Phase 3

Clinical Controlled Trial to Determinate the Role of Sodium Bicarbonate in the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in High-Risk Patients Undergoing to Diagnostic Coronariography and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez2 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentOctober 2006

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Acute Kidney Failure
Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
Enrollment
100
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Contrast-induced nephropathy
Last Updated
19 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether sodium bicarbonate is effective in the prevention of sodium-induced nephropathy

Detailed Description

The use of contrast media is more frequent as new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are developed. As a consequence, the occurrence of acute renal failure (ARF), also known as contrast-induced nephropathy, is more frequently seen after the realization of these procedures, representing about 10% of all in-hospital ARF. The importance of preventing this complication is related with its strong association with higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients who present it. A number of drugs and interventions have been studied for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy, including intravenous hydration with normal and hypotonic saline solutions, oral hydration, mannitol, diuretics, dopamine and its antagonists (fenoldopam), calcium antagonists, theophylline, N-acetylcysteine, natriuretic atrial peptide and hemodialysis after or during contrast media administration. There is only one study in humans that demonstrates the utility of the sodium bicarbonate to prevent the contrast-induced nephropathy, showing a reduction in the incidence of this complication of about 13.6%. Although this result could seem convincing, its relevance has been questioned because the definition used by the authors as contrast-induced nephropathy was an increase of 25% from basal creatinine. Although when compared, the absolute differences between basal and after-procedure creatinines were not statistically significative, the sample size was small and the participants were low-risk patients to develop contrast-induced nephropathy. It is also important to note that the control group was hydrated with a dextrose 5% solution with 154 mEq of NaCl, although today's most accepted prevention therapy is intravenous hydration with normal saline solution. Comparison: Hydration previously, during and afterwards contrast media administration with normal saline solution (0.9%), compared to hydration previous, during and afterwards contrast media administration with a solution made of normal saline and sodium bicarbonate.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2006
End Date
January 2007
Last Updated
19 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age over 18 years old
  • Indication for coronariography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Voluntary written consent for the realization of coronariography and/or percutaneous intervention and for the participation in this clinical trial
  • A MEHRAN contrast-induced nephropathy score of six or more

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with chronic kidney failure requiring any kind of dialysis
  • Patients unable to complete follow-up
  • Multiple myeloma
  • Exposure to contrast 48 hours prior to study
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients unable to give consent
  • Already receiving sodium bicarbonate solutions
  • Receiving contrast media other than non-ionic

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Contrast-induced nephropathy

Secondary Outcomes

  • Hemodialysis

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials