Comparison of 3 different gingival retraction agents
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K039- Disease of hard tissues of teeth,unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/09/057754
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Unnati Agarwal
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 36
i.Patients willing for voluntary participation & have signed informed consent for the described procedure.
ii.Patients having good physical and mental health.
iii.Systemically healthy subjects.
iv.Patients requiring two individual single unit Fixed partial denture.
v.Patients well motivated for fixed partial denture.
vi.Patients well motivated for Porcelain fused Metal crown.
vii.Patients with healthy gingiva.
Partially edentulous patients
ii.Patients with implant site
iii.Patients with gingival recession
iv.Periodontally compromised tooth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.To evaluate the amount of gingival retraction using retraction cord with epinephrine in single unit fixed partial dentures. <br/ ><br>2.To evaluate the amount of gingival retraction using retraction paste in single unit fixed partial dentures. <br/ ><br>3.To evaluate the amount of gingival retraction using retraction gel in single unit fixed partial dentures. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: within 1 day of impression making
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare amount of gingival retraction using retraction cord with epinephrine, retraction paste and retraction cord in single unit fixed partial dentures. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 2 months