To compare three gingival retraction system with aluminium chloride astringent.
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/05/033770
- Lead Sponsor
- Hardik Maradiya
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Clinically healthy gingiva and periodontium around the teeth
Properly root canal treated teeth/vital teeth
Maxillary/Mandibular 1st molar
Exclusion Criteria
Tipped, tilted or rotated abutment teeth
Patients with gingival recession, high plaque index, bleeding on probing, pernicious oral habits, hormonal imbalance, immunocompromised and debilitating pre-existing systemic conditions.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinically acceptable retraction will be achieved.Timepoint: 2 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method astringent retraction paste will have good gingival bleeding control capacityTimepoint: 2 years