MedPath

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Thyroid Disease
Parathyroid Disease
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01805856
Lead Sponsor
Ito Hospital
Brief Summary

The effectiveness of antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) for prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) following thyroid and parathyroid surgery remains uncertain. Present prospective randomized control study (Ito-RCT1) assessed the effectiveness of AMP in clean neck surgery associated with thyroid and parathyroid disease.

Detailed Description

Between November 2010 and April 2012, 2164 consecutive patients who agreed to attend the randomized control study were enrolled. All the participants received surgery for thyroid and parathyroid disease at Ito Hospital and randomized in three groups; Group A (n=541): operation with AMP (PIPC, piperacillin sodium), Group B (n=541): operation with AMP (CEZ, cefazolin sodium), and Group C (n=1082): operation without AMP.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who did not agree to attend the randomized control study.

* Patients who received the operation including mediastinum with sternotomy.

* Patients who received the operation including additional resection of trachea, esophagus and larynx.

* Patients who received the re-operation for post-operative bleedings.

* Patients who had known allergy to cephem or penicillin.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
2164
Inclusion Criteria
  • Between November 2010 and April 2012, 2164 consecutive patients who agreed to attend the randomized control study were enrolled. All the participants received surgery for thyroid and parathyroid disease at Ito Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who did not agree to attend the randomized control study.
  • Patients who received the operation including mediastinum with sternotomy.
  • Patients who received the operation including additional resection of trachea, esophagus and larynx.
  • Patients who received the re-operation for post-operative bleedings.
  • Patients who had known allergy to cephem or penicillin.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group A (intervention PIPC)PIPC piperacillin sodiumPatients in group A (intervention PIPC) were given AMP of 2g PIPC intravenously just after intubation. If the operation time was longer than 3 hours, additional infusion of same dose PIPC was done. After coming back to the patients' own room, one more infusion of same dose of same drug was done.
Group B (intervention CEZ)CEZ, cefazolin sodiumPatients in Group B (intervention CEZ) were given AMP of 1g CEZ intravenously just after intubation. If the operation time was longer than 3 hours, additional infusion of same dose CEZ was done. After coming back to the patients' own room, one more infusion of same dose of same drug was done.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgical site infections after thyroid and parathyroid surgery1 month after operation

Surgical site infection was defined as patients who are necessary to receive the treatment such as surgical drainage or antibiotic medication. When the patients receive the surgical drainage, microbial culture was performed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Side effect of the drug for Antimicrobial prophylaxis4 days after operation

The appearances of drug allergic reactions (skin rash and anaphylactic shock) were checked at operating room. Blood test to check up liver and renal dysfunction was done on the 3rd POD. Liver and renal dysfunction is clinically diagnosed by patients' own physicians and the author, and only counted the cases which function got worse compared to preoperative data.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ito Hospital

🇯🇵

Tokyo, Japan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath