A clinical trial comparing two ventilation methods,automated jet ventilation and assisted spontaneous ventilation during rigid bronchoscopy procedure for removing tracheobronchial foreign body in childre
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Tracheobronchial foreign body and ventilation methods during rigid bronchoscopy
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2011/07/001895
- Lead Sponsor
- JIPMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 47
Inclusion Criteria
All children subjected to foreign body bronchoscopy with h/o suspected foreign body aspiration, below 12 years age
Exclusion Criteria
1)Allergic to lignocaine
2)Airway is intubated prior to procedure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Automated jet ventilation (AJV) and Assisted spontaneous ventilation (ASV) are equally effective in providing adequate oxygenation and ventilation.Timepoint: Oxygenation - assesed by rise in PaO2 from baseline. <br/ ><br>Ventilation - assessed by rise/fall PaCO2 from baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgeons comfort was better with JV than with ASV. Occurrence of critical events is not influenced by either ventilatory method.Timepoint: score of 1,2 & 3. 1- good, 2- acceptable, 3- poor.