MedPath

Comparison of Haemodynamic Effects During Orotracheal Intubation, by Direct or Indirect Laryngoscopy With Airtraq

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Orotracheal Intubation
Interventions
Device: orotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy
Device: orotracheal intubation by indirect laryngoscopy
Registration Number
NCT03743831
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Brief Summary

News techniques of intubation by indirect laryngoscopy have arrived in operating rooms but they are still too restricted to situations (difficult intubation criteria ..). It wanted to focus on indirect laryngoscopy by Airtraq. This technique allows better exposure during intubation while limiting mouth opening and cervical hyper extension, but also dental trauma and lip wounds. It also reduces the duration of laryngoscopy and therefore at the same time the apnea time. After a review of the literature, it has been proven that its use reduces haemodynamic changes during intubation. But these studies have been realized only in very particular patients (obese, heart failure) and with induction protocols that are not used routinely in our operating theaters.

Reasons why it decided to carry out this study, on the one hand to find these results and especially to be able to extend them to the whole population.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
218
Inclusion Criteria
  • Specific medical conditions: ASA 1 or 2
  • Patient having given written consent to participate in the category 2 trial
  • Intubation realized by experienced person
  • Social Insured Patient
  • Patient willing to comply with all procedures of the study and its duration
Exclusion Criteria
  • Demographic characteristics: minor, over 65
  • Medical history: history of difficult intubation, hypertension
  • Lille intubation score greater than or equal to 7
  • Treatments in progress: Beta taking blocking the day of the operation.
  • Administrative reasons: inability to receive informed information, inability to participate in the entire study, lack of coverage by the social security system, refusal to sign consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
orotracheal intubation directorotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy-
orotracheal intubation indirectorotracheal intubation by indirect laryngoscopy-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
change from intubation mean blood pressure at 1 min after intubationbetween the values before intubation (T0) and 1min after intubation.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Frequency of patients with hemodynamic reaction post intubation (minimal variation of mean blood pressure or heart rate of 20%between values before intubation and 1, 2, 5, 10 minutes after intubation.
Variation of blood pressure (PAM)between the values before intubation (T0) and 2, 5 and 10 minutes of intubation
Frequency of patients with dental trauma and / or an injury to the lips due to the intubation device.at 10 min after intubation
Variation of heart rate (HR)between the values before intubation (T0) and 1, 2, 5 and 10 minutes of intubation
Mean of the arterial blood pressure and heart ratebefore intubation and at 1,2,5 and 10 minutes from intubation.

delta defined by the difference between the values

instantaneous ANI deltabetween ANI before intubation and 1,2,5 and 10 min after intubation
Intubation time in seconds from introduction of the intubation device into the mouth with inflation of the balloonat 1 min after intubation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU

🇫🇷

Lille, France

Hôpital Roger Salengro, CHU
🇫🇷Lille, France
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath